The Movable Buffet

Dispatches from Las Vegas
by Richard Abowitz

Category: Vegas Talk

Vandals deface 'Welcome to Fabulous Las Vegas' icon

July 14, 2009 |  8:37 am

LVsign


If terms like "street art" seem a little disingenuous, I have to admit graffiti was never an issue that has really upset me much. But some jerks going at the iconic "Welcome to Fabulous Las Vegas" sign Monday really upset me and a lot of people I have spoken to about this vandalism. Like many cities, we have graffiti everywhere, but no one has ever vandalized the welcome sign before in the memory of anyone I reached, and it seems likely that this may not have ever happened before. Take that in for a moment: Since the sign was first created to greet tourists in 1959, no one has put graffiti on it despite the countless alcohol-soaked tourists who must have posed with the welcome sign over the years. I don't even think a fraternity has ever stolen it as a prank. This is one bit of Las Vegas history that no one has suggested replacing or taking to the Neon Boneyard (though it gets moved south occasionally to keep pace with the growth of the Strip). The welcome sign is the one link with old Vegas that remains totally relevant in 2009.

I guess my surprise is that kids don't scribble their initials on the sign more often, because it is so accessible and popular. But until Monday, the Betty Willis design has received nothing but respect from tourists and locals. I always smile when I drive past it going to and from work. Buffet photographer Sarah Gerke was out there this morning, and most of the scribbled initials left by the vandals had already been removed. But there is still some graffiti you can see in the lower left corner of the photo. A cleaning crew should finish restoring the sign today, according to the Review-Journal, which also has a shot of the more extensive graffiti, since removed, placed on the sign.

I should say I have almost never seen the sign alone no matter what hour I drive past it. I always see tourists who are posing with the sign, or wedding parties gathered there. But at 3 or 4 in the morning, you just have to trust that no one wants to do something like this, as there is nothing stopping them. My worry is that if this begins to happen more often the welcome sign will not remain as accessible as it is now. This is a tiny sign somewhat defenseless 24/7 on Las Vegas Boulevard. But it is also a crucial part of the Vegas experience. It demarcates nothing in reality as it sits on no real border, but that makes it an even more perfect greeting to the Strip's fantasy kingdom.

Sad that someone(s) thought this was a cool thing to do.

Photo credit: Sarah Gerke


Vegas weekend: Carmen Electra, H.L. Mencken, and Meghan McCain

July 13, 2009 |  9:29 am

CarmenElectra

I have to admit that I did not work hard this past weekend. I did not intend to work at all. I had fun. I live in Vegas, and mostly my work is fun. I get to enjoy Vegas all year.  But this weekend I had friends in town and events I wanted to be at for reasons not work-related. 

Of course, I did do some work, if you can call it work. I made it to "Crazy Horse" with Carmen Electra. She looked fabulous, and that is hard for a 37-year-old woman being framed by young dancers barely into their 20s. But Electra has enough energy and joy in her role to make the moments she is on stage bring the production to life. Sadly, there are not enough of those moments. The show is far duller than I remembered it. The full topless views have increased over the last year, as if uncovering the dancers covers that this show is dedicated to sensuality and aesthetics from another era. Every number goes on too long (the full length of a song), continuing after the presentation and dance moves have been fully exhausted. The light projecting off the bodies of the dancers reminds me of dated psychedelic films. Andy Warhol would be a fan of "Crazy Horse." On the other hand, fans of Warhol's movies are very few, and for good reason. "Crazy Horse" has the same problem: all surface with little to hold your attention. The variety act has gone from a mini-Michael Jackson doll to a mini-Elvis Presley doll. The worst numbers I think are supposed to be the comic relief: cabaret-style songs with a topless dancer pretending to sing about being a naughty girl who is looking for a man with a big wallet.

"Crazy Horse" has some of the best-looking showgirls to be seen on the Strip, and I am told that the dancing talent required to appear in the show is incredible. But "Crazy Horse" is too attached to its traditions to keep up with Vegas in 2009. One hopes with that much beauty and talent on staff, a better show than "Crazy Horse" can be created.  Electra is worth seeing, but otherwise the happy-to-be- middlebrow approach of "Peepshow" works far better. Tonight is Electra's last scheduled night.

My favorite adult show of all time in Vegas is "Fashionistas," created by pornographer John Stagliano. After the show closed in 2008, Stagliano became a social friend of mine, and so I no longer cover him for that reason. Therefore, I did not intend to write about the dinner he invited me to on Saturday night for a libertarian convention called FreedomFest, billed as "The World's Largest Gathering of Free Minds." But I can't resist.

In a case brought under the Bush Justice Department and not dropped by the Obama administration, Stagliano has been indicted on charges of distributing obscenity. On the other hand, I got the feeling a lot of the people around us would be happy to see him rot in jail despite all the calls for freedom. Liberal values were frequently mocked by the speakers. And one of the keynote speakers, some cable anchor whom I had never seen or heard of before, explicitly referred to "left-wing" social liberalism as being part of the agenda ruining the country. While one would think there would be a lot of calls for freedom at FreedomFest, a war against cap-and-trade and marginal tax rates were really what the libertarians talking wanted to embrace. (Shouldn't there have been at least one "freedom-lover" calling for the charges against him to be be dropped, or am I just biased as his friend?)

"Obamaism" was frequently invoked and applauded by the well-heeled crowd that I estimate was about 1,000 folks. But because Barack Obama has only been president a few months, I searched for a definition among everyone I met there. Most people seemed as unclear as I am about its meaning, but despite working as an applause line, as a word, "Obamaism" is really just finding its legs, they admitted. 

Adjacent to me was Steve Forbes. Though inches from each other, Forbes and Stagliano did not speak together. That would have been an interesting conversation to hear and tell you about. Forbes did, however, give a speech to much applause and calls for him to run for president. He sounded like he was running. He was upset about the status quo and taxes  -- very upset about taxes -- but said he has faith in the American people.

Then came the inductions into the freedom-lovers hall of fame. I perked up when H.L. Mencken was inducted. I wonder if the Sage of Baltimore would have approved? Thoughts?

But my favorite moment was at the end (before a Beatles tribute band came out to play "Twist and Shout"). Everyone was asked to sing the festival's theme song "Freedom and Gold." So, indicted pornographer John Stagliano and former Republican presidential candidate Steve Forbes (two men who probably agree on little outside of hating marginal tax rates) were brought together by the power of music and lyrics supplied on the back of the menu (and yes, that chicken breast at FreedomFest was free-range). And all sang: "Now who are the enemies of liberty's soul? Taxation, inflation and government control." 

Meanwhile, although she turned me down for an interview, so I do not know if she was at the FreedomFest banquet, Meghan McCain was in Vegas this weekend sending out Tweets. Sunday night, her final Tweet: "Off to see peepshow, already saw the sexy, sultry, amazingly fetishy zumanity. Hope Holly's bump and grind is just as good!"

One wonders if she would be this honest if her dad was in the White House.

Photo: Carmen Electra. Credit: Sarah Gerke


Vegas news with less Michael Jackson

July 1, 2009 | 12:20 pm

CityCenter

Two big Vegas players are included on the money end of the Jackson saga. Colony Capital, a partial owner of the Las Vegas Hilton (where Elvis performed), bailed Neverland out of foreclosure. And AEG, which books and produces Cher and Bette Midler at Caesars and Santana at the Hard Rock, was the promoter behind the London concerts. Both companies seem to be caught having to choose between losing millions and/or engaging in desperate acts to squeeze money from what has been left behind (rehearsal footage and an empty mansion). No doubt anything they do to recoup their money many will see as in questionable taste.

Remember Jackson declared in a statement released after Neverland was searched that he would never consider the place home again. Did he ever even return there? And releasing any of the rehearsal footage of a perfectionist is not at all an appropriate coda. And even as a tribute show, there is no Michael Jackson concert in London without Michael Jackson. That is the thing about unique talents: They are irreplaceable.

Certainly, given the Vegas angles, this city is as obsessed with Jackson as any other place right now. But there is other news in the Entertainment Capital of the World. For starters the city is gearing up (click for complete list of activities) for July 4 weekend in a rough economy. And when, like me, you live across the street from a casino you get letters like this in the mail:

"Dear Neighbor:
On Saturday July 4, 2009 a special event will take place at Green Valley Ranch. This event will feature a fireworks display, and due to your close proximity to Green Valley Ranch, we would like to make you aware of the event. The fireworks will begin at 9:30 p.m. and last approximately 10 minutes..."


The Las Vegas Sun and Review-Journal have stories on what seems the incredible incompetence that in part led to abandoning building many floors at one of the towers at CityCenter (pictured) on the Strip. The local word among politicians and casino insiders is that the success of this mega-resort of all mega-resorts is the best hope to revive Las Vegas. The idea is that interest in the new destination resort will fill the city with so many tourists that all boats lift on the rising tide. Surely a tide metaphor is a dangerous place to be in a desert landscape?

Every day we have thousands of rooms on the Strip going unused in this economy, and while how many rooms CityCenter adds to that total depends who you ask on what day the answer is certainly thousands more rooms. Therefore isn't this more likely to be a problem than a solution? We will see. CityCenter at least is set to start opening before the end of the year, unlike two other multibillion-dollar projects in Vegas with one defaulting on loans (Cosmopolitan) and the other going into bankruptcy (Fontainebleau).

Lance Burton, the longtime headliner at Monte Carlo, put to bed rumors of his retirement by announcing a new contract that will keep him at Monte Carlo for as long as six more years. Burton does the best traditional magic show in Vegas. If you have kids who have never seen a magic show, then Burton is the big-production show that you should make their first experience. I am thrilled he is staying in the neighborhood.


Speaking of things kids will love, I finally made it to "The Lion King" at Mandalay Bay.  It has not received the Vegas treatment like "Phantom: The Las Vegas Spectacular." This is a replication of the Broadway show including intermission. Therefore I feel no particular need to review it with detail. But I found "Lion King" fun and joyful, and I suspect based on a thick crowd on a Monday, a traditionally slow night on the Strip, the show will enjoy a long run in Vegas. Whatever Broadway-Vegas problems other shows at other casinos have faced, Mandalay Bay has proven immune, previously enjoying a long run for "Mamma Mia" also at full production length.

This blog has been honored with two recent mentions in the news. One of my favorite blogs is David McKee's Stiffs & Georges. His focus is on the big picture of casino operations, and I was pleased the Buffet was named by him one of the essential Vegas blogs. Check out his entire list, and be sure to read his blog if you care at all about who is winning your money at the top of the food chain and what they are doing with it (these days, stay one step ahead of debt, mostly). Also, Review-Journal's Norm Clarke quoted this blog this morning while covering Criss Angel's shameless season-opener plan for his cable series.

Photo: Sarah Gerke


Boyd Gaming makes move for Station Casinos

February 25, 2009 | 12:55 pm
The Boyd offer for Station properties is the talk of Vegas.

This may seem like inside baseball as both companies are known for catering to locals. But this attempted purchase also makes clear the different ways the future of Las Vegas is being viewed.

To me, the offer by Boyd to buy competitor Station casinos on Tuesday goes to the heart of the dilemma for Vegas watchers. What sort of city will emerge from the other side of this financial crisis? Boyd's offer is at a fraction of what those casinos were worth just a couple of years ago, probably less than they cost to build, and yet this transaction still represents the risk of plunging a fortune into Vegas right now. Is it the bargain of a lifetime, or throwing good money after bad?

Everyone wonders how Las Vegas is going to recover from its current economic troubles.  We ultimately may become a smaller city that focuses on gambling as its core business rather than peddling a lifestyle. But the Boyd offer requires a faith in return to growth that spills off the Strip and into neighborhoods.

I too have total faith in Las Vegas to once again be the fastest-growing city in the country. There are some caveats. Most of the key players on the Strip now have so much debt they may not make it to the other side. But while I do not know who is going to own the Strip in a few years, I am sure that by then the world will need Las Vegas as much as in the past. Why? Because this city sells a unique experience. You cannot replace Las Vegas with anything, nor is the Las Vegas experience subject to illegal downloads. And, if you are an international traveler, Las Vegas represents the perfect experience of United States culture -- maybe, not the one Americans would choose to make a first impression, but nonetheless we are a purely frontier creation in our nouveau riche gaudy fecklessness.

Maybe Las Vegas is more barbaric yawp than reasoned pragmatism, but both are abundant in how things are approached here.

Let me go from abstract to specific. Boyd Gaming in that offer showed that the company was willing to change its future in a way that was both an example of fearlessness and pragmatism.  (I should say my mom has taken the time to let me know she owns stock in Boyd, not sure how much or when she bought it, which suggests enough appearance of a conflict that I should pass that information on to you.) 
Boyd pulled out of building Echelon on the Strip as the recession hit hard last year. The result was that the company was stuck with a hunk of rusting metal on a parcel of land on the Strip and this paradox: You would only sell that land in this economy if you had no alternative and ditto with building on the land.
Though Boyd had been a locals gaming giant for years, by taking down the Stardust and planning the high-end Echelon in its place, Boyd seemed to have lost direction along with its failure to jump into the luxury Strip resort market. A week ago, I would have thought at best they were going to limp into the future of Vegas.

But Boyd Gaming (using credit presumably untapped after the decision to halt work on Echelon) found in the offer for Station properties a possibly brilliant solution to their dilemma. The surprise $950 million offer would turn over to Boyd many of the properties built and owned by their now financially troubled competitor. According to the Review-Journal:

"Boyd Gaming would acquire the bulk of Station Casinos' 18 Southern Nevada properties, including Green Valley Ranch Resort, the recently opened Aliante Station, Santa Fe Station, Texas Station, Wild Wild West, the two Fiesta properties in Henderson and North Las Vegas, and several smaller non-hotel gaming businesses, such as the Wildfire."

This would be fire-sale pricing  To give you a sense of what a bargain these purchases would be for Boyd,  Aliante Station alone recently opened its doors at a cost of $662 million. So, no surprise that the privately held Station gave the sort of terse formal response required by the letter of the law to Boyd's offer. One can expect the family that built and runs Station, though no longer the majority owners, to try to resist this transaction in any way possible if their debt and creditors allow them to do so.

But if Boyd are able to pull off this purchase, a big if, then Boyd Gaming will have a near monopoly on the locals market in addition to the bargain pricing on the real estate. That would mean instead of having to start from near scratch building a casino on the Strip like Echelon, when a recovery comes, they will already be in a position to benefit by having a handful of these newly acquired properties spread out across the Las Vegas valley. Also, this implicitly, if not explicitly, would end any pressure on the company to do something with the land that holds the mothballed Echelon, as the Station properties purchased would be responsible for fresh revenue to pay off Boyd's debt.

So where is the downside for Boyd? What if Vegas does not come back to its 2006 levels? Empty neighborhoods are no place to own a casino, and people upside-down on their mortgage cannot be counted on as loyal and regular customers. What if Las Vegas becomes a more modest and less populous place? Now would be the worst time under that scenario to borrow nearly $1 billion to invest in the local Las Vegas casino market.

In fact, professional investment analysts  see a company investing nearly $1 billion in Vegas real estate right now as hardly positive and worth some serious scrutiny. According to AP: "Moody's Investors Service said Tuesday that it would review Boyd Gaming Corp.'s ratings for a possible downgrade following the casino operator's bid to buy Station Casino Inc.'s assets."

But to me, the Boyd offer shows that company believes Las Vegas has a future of growth not too different from the past, and the key is to be the one who owns the casino when that day comes. In many cases, that may not be the same entities that absorbed all the debt it took to build the place. But when the musical chairs are over, someone will own the resorts when the recovery comes to Vegas.

But when and in what form the recovery will take is a total mystery to a town that had always seen itself as recession proof. Still, Las Vegas remains a unique city to visit without any real equal in the world. And I believe that the future of Vegas remains bright for that reason.

Boyd has figured out that, in this market, rather than build resorts, the opportunity lies in having the cash at the right moment when those who build the resorts stumble. That isn't pretty. The Fertitta family has spent years building Station into the dominant locals casino company, only to see Boyd attempt this move on the family business at a low moment. As a fellow intergenerational gaming family, I am sure the Boyd family is in a unique place to understand what it is doing to the Fertitta family. Still, this is the ruthless pragmatism that always is at work in Vegas. But underneath this brutal realism is that barbaric yawp: the blind belief in a return to permanent growth as the long-term future of Vegas.

The idea, which I essentially accept, that Vegas will soon be growing again probably looks like insanity if you don't live here.

Right now, the evidence is that more hotel rooms are constantly coming on line (M resort opens on Las Vegas Boulevard next week, and City Center's resorts are set to begin opening before the year is out) while the old rooms are going for record low pricing yet still left unused. This has been resulting in month upon month of declining occupancy, price per room and gambling wins for Vegas resorts.

Meanwhile, locally Las Vegas has been labeled the foreclosure capital of the country,  framed by politicians as the poster child of wasteful convention spots and called the most deserted city in America. Even our art museum shutters for good this weekend.

Andre Agassi's former manager sues Steffi Graf

December 8, 2008 | 10:02 am

Andreagassiandsteffigraf20071007 In a town that worships fame, there are few, if any, residents more revered than Andre Agassi.  Here, he is more than a celebrity. He's a local boy who not only made good, but who also gives back to his community. Agassi doesn't travel the celebrity circuit in Vegas; he almost never turns up on red carpets at openings. He's also very private, rarely granting interviews to the media. Agassi comes across as someone who guards his privacy. But that privacy is being threatened by a lawsuit against his wife.

Some background:

To the best of my memory, I have only interviewed Andre Agassi once in the last decade while covering  Vegas. And, of course, the occasion for our 2007 interview was Agassi's annual charity concert (Sheryl Crow  performed at the 2008 benefit) and dinner that raises money for the Andre Agassi Foundation.

That event, Andre Agassi's Grand Slam for Children, now at Wynn, has been THE gathering of the local elite in Vegas for 13 years now.

The Agassi Foundation benefit is also the only time I know of that the retired tennis player uses his lifetime network of Vegas connections to produce what Vegas calls juice. Agassi has a lot of juice. The result is wealthy donors and companies (including executives from many Strip casinos) sponsor tables at the event. Over the years, the Grand Slam events have helped Agassi raise tens of millions for the foundation.

Philanthropy is not all Agassi does. He's known locally as an investor in projects. The behind-the-scenes player on the business side for Andre Agassi was childhood friend Perry Rogers. Rogers received enough credit for Agassi's perceived investment smarts to be included in a New York Times article (along with Agassi) in a May profile looking at the next generation of Vegas moguls.

But in October, Agassi and Rogers announced they were ending their business relationship. They made a point of emphasizing how amicable the split was and how the friendship was intact. In fact, Rogers in October insisted that preserving the friendship was the paramount objective for them both. Now comes the news that Rogers has filed a lawsuit against Agassi's wife, retired pro tennis player Stefanie Graf, for the tiny, tiny sum of $50,000. To compare: A Diamond Level table at  Agassi's Grand Slam for Children cost $85,000 this year.

OK, $50,000 is still a lot of money to me. But reading the four-page lawsuit (posted by the Las Vegas Sun), one discovers that, for Rogers, the payments represent less than two months' pay from Graf. In fact, she did not even commence paying Rogers until 2007 when one of Graf's accounts hit the magic $20-million mark. From that point on, she paid him her 15% until the time of her husband's split with Rogers in October. Therefore, the money sought represents only what's owed for the last couple months. So, maybe it would be better to say, rather than $50,000 being a tiny sum, this seems a tiny reason to file a lawsuit against the wife of your lifelong friend.

Then again, at four pages, the lawsuit was clearly written to give away as little information as possible. For example, one glaring omission: There is no mention of what Rogers' contributions were or the significance of the $20 million that resulted in the the allegedly owed payments.  I suspect this lawsuit is more about Rogers showing his willingness to use the courts and place matters in the public arena than about his desire to recoup the $50,000 he feels owed.

That seems to be how Agassi is taking the lawsuit. In a statement that appears in Norm Clarke's Review-Journal column, Agassi says: "I am both saddened and disappointed to learn that Perry has filed a lawsuit and sadder still that he has sued my wife, Stefanie. I remain hopeful that we will be able to resolve our business issues with minimal damage to our families and mutual friends." It will be noted that Agassi's statement does not mention preserving his own friendship with Rogers.

Photo: Andre Agassi and Steffi Graf. Credit: Sarah Gerke


Liberace and Spinoza via Joyce Carol Oates

October 20, 2008 |  2:08 pm

What is the difference between a great writer and a regular person? Perhaps, thinking of Spinoza and imagining fiction in even the most banal Vegas experience: a visit to the Liberace Museum. On Saturday night, Joyce Carol Oates gave her first Las Vegas reading, attracting about 400 people to hear the acclaimed author. Before the reading of a story centered on Emily Dickinson, Oates told the audience her reaction to earlier in the day becoming one of the countless tourists to visit the Liberace Museum:

“It was so interesting, and I could imagine a person writing a story about it. When you first come in, it is so campy and extravagant and fantastic. And then, as you really look into it -- there is a guide who talks about the life, particularly the end of the life of Liberace -- it suddenly takes a turn and becomes very poignant. It becomes almost an emblem of the human spirit with a focus on Liberace’s great courage and chutzpah. As Spinoza said, we yearn to persist in our being, and almost to the very day he was dying of AIDS, he was still performing and still himself. And I think any of us who are writers or artists or human beings can find a resonance in that.”

For Sunday night, she told me while signing books after the reading, her plan was to see Mystere. I wonder what she made of Cirque?


Vegas Anger At All-Star Crowd

February 22, 2007 |  4:06 pm
The stories about the crowds in town for All-Star weekend continue to be draw-dropping. And, locals don't seem ready to move on yet. Let me preface this by saying the resorts take a lot of pride in customer service. Frontline workers on the Strip are not minimum wage workers but highly compensated professionals offering a mix of obsequiousness and hard work that is meant to give every tourist the VIP experience. So, Vegas workers will put up with a lot from tourists without complaining. Casino workers rarely confront troublesome customers rather they try to soothe things over. The sad truth is that the more obnoxious tourists can often bully their way into comps and other treats meant to keep everyone happy. 
 
But the over-the-top "thug" behavior of the All-Star NBA crowd has left in its wake a boiling fury among cocktail waitresses, bartenders, security and other jaded pros of the Strip. Among the nightclubs where incidents seem to have taken place on the Strip are hot spots at Wynn, Mandalay Bay and freestanding Empire Ballroom. Off Strip, the topless bars proved a center for problems, too. The stories range from bottles being thrown at employees to guns being confiscated. An employee at Empire told me about having to hide in the back with other workers when a melee broke out shortly after reports that a gun had found its way into the club. For the entire weekend this person reported that female bartenders and cocktail servers at Empire were routinely addressed by customers with obscenities the nicest of which rhymes with witch. I have heard similar treatment was meted out by customers to servers at Pure. Even the usually mellow Peppermill seems to have been the scene of hassles.
 
Of course, the incident so far getting press attention is the shooting at the strip club Minxx. That incident combines many of the factors that workers blame for the problems elsewhere:  outside promoters, celebrities with large entourages and irresponsible behavior by everyone involved. The Review-Journal reports police have talked to NFL player Adam "Pacman" Jones who may have known the shooter.
 
In all the uproar over the tourists who came here last weekend, particularly disconcerting to the servers I interviewed was the question if race played a part in their perception of the crowd. All denied it. One worker at Empire told me: "These were thugs.  It was mostly black people, yes, but this had nothing to do with race. I also got called 'slut' by a white guy with a grill. It was thug culture."
 
In all Las Vegas seems traumatized by the entire experience of All-Star weekend.

City Persecutes Homeless with Imaginary Law

December 5, 2006 |  1:44 pm

I want to stop writing about how Las Vegas treats homeless people, especially this time of year. But the sadistic approach that is consistently being taken by authorities here is just too shameful. The first sentence in the Review-Journal story says it all: "Las Vegas city marshals jailed three homeless men last week for violating a nonexistent ordinance."

Meet the Vegas Patriot Act. It's aimed not at terrorists but the weakest most vulnerable members of our society. There can be few worse places to find yourself in life than washed up and homeless on the streets of this city. Try imagining what that must be like for a minute.

Everyone grasps that this problem is complex. But Las Vegas is clearly a wealthy city that can afford some carrots instead of beating people with unconstitutional sticks until they go live on the streets of another town. We are a city that should be truly compassionate, since if you've lived here for any length of time you will know someone who fell on hard times thanks to the games we play, the activities we advertise and the culture we have. You will know people who fell lower than they ever thought they could go — further down than even you thought they would go — and kept falling.

In Las Vegas, the tumble from apparent riches to total rags can be as quick as it is steep. Perhaps, therefore, a little mercy is in order. Indeed, mercy should be a special part of the Las Vegas approach to how to help those at the bottom.


Britney And Mr. Britney-No-More

November 13, 2006 | 11:17 am

Robin Leach apparently has the inside Vegas track on the most anticipated breakup since Michael Jackson/Lisa Marie Presley. On his blog, Luxe Life, Leach teases today with:

"Luxe Life has all the details tomorrow of a possible collision between the furious feuding couple right here in Vegas along with the financial breakdown of that supposedly ironclad airtight prenup. That's likely to ace Federline out of a hoped-for $10-million payday as he throws his own custody battle for their two babies as a bargaining chip into the ugly fight. "

You got to love the consonance and assonance! Meanwhile, Britney and Mr. Britney-No-More are both rumored to be looking into gigs in Vegas.


V Theater Update

August 29, 2006 | 10:25 am

I called David Saxe, the just-ousted operator of the V Theater, lots. Then I heard there was a meeting between the warring factions at the V Theater that ended at 11 a.m. So I waited and tried again a short while after that.

Saxe eventually answered and sort of complimented me on my persistence. Saxe said he was in the middle of a meeting with his lawyer. His voice was hoarse. And, while he didn't quite promise to call me back, I waited a decent interval of billable hours and tried him again. But now I have just heard from his publicist that David Saxe will have a statement for media tomorrow.



Advertisement

About the Bloggers

Recent Comments
 
RE: Movable Buffet: Final entry | comment by Peter
 
RE: Aubrey O’Day and Perez Hilton | comment by Jenna
 
RE: Movable Buffet: Final entry | comment by Blazingcatfur
 
RE: Movable Buffet: Final entry | comment by Ultan


Categories


Recent Posts
Movable Buffet: Final entry |  November 4, 2009, 1:05 pm »
Photos from Fangoria: Trinity of Terrors |  November 1, 2009, 8:45 am »
Oops, I am a tourist (and it's expensive) |  October 31, 2009, 10:00 am »
Fright Dome: Huge haunted houses at Circus Circus |  October 30, 2009, 11:47 am »

Archives