The Movable Buffet

Dispatches from Las Vegas
by Richard Abowitz

Category: Pure Nightclub

Who is running Pure nightclub?

January 29, 2009 |  4:06 pm

Pure That used to be a simple question; and, Steve Davidovici was the answer. As a managing partner Davidovici was there every night I ever visited Pure and was very much in charge of every detail. But while the club is still one of the hottest spots in Vegas, the architect of Pure's success isn't as clearly visible anymore; in fact, Pure won't even say if he works there still. But I am getting ahead of myself.

It has been almost a year since the IRS raided Pure at Caesars Palace, the first time since the days of the mob that such an operation has taken place within a Strip casino. But the 2008 raid of Pure had nothing to do with gambling. The nightclub is run by Pure Management Group, which has numerous restaurants and nightclubs up and down the Strip. The company leases the space from the resort. At the center of the IRS investigation was said to be Pure managing partner Steve Davidovici, whose home it was reported the IRS visited.

Two days ago I received a tip from a former nightclub insider that Stevie D., as he is widely known in Vegas, had been pushed out at PMG months ago. I tried to get this detail confirmed by asking PMG what would seem a straightforward question:

"Is Stevie D. still a managing partner of PMG?"

After almost two days of follow-up calls, the odd response I got was that PMG does not comment on personnel matters. I find this answer odd because Steve Davidovici is an owner and so if he still is part of the company should not be a "personnel matter." Also, it wasn't so long ago that Davidovici was being put out front for Pure by being profiled in Blender and giving interviews speaking for Pure in USA Today.

Davidovici's current status with Pure was brought to my attention by one source and then confirmed with another, both nightclub insiders and one a former PMG employee, though neither wanted their names used out of concern for their current jobs at non-PMG clubs. According to both of them, Stevie D. is no longer welcome at Pure or actively involved in the company but may still be being paid or be a technical owner. If true, this might explain the reluctance of PMG to comment. Certainly, Stevie D. received a lot of negative press as well as attention to his sometimes violent past after the investigation became public.

So what about the raid and its aftermath? This is all speculation and should be taken with a grain of salt, but my nightclub sources expect indictments stemming from that raid to be coming next month. I was given a list of names of people whom one source expects to be indicted and have reached out to some people on the list. No one has gotten back in touch with me even to proclaim their innocence.

The focus of the IRS seems to be on if cash from the green handshakes that make Vegas run was allegedly pooled and divided between some employees and some management without being reported as income. The odd term I have been told insiders at Pure allegedly used for this alleged division of cash was the "wachk," spelled like that. Stay tuned for what may be one of the big stories of 2009 in Vegas.

Photo: Sarah Gerke


Walking out on Mariah Carey

October 8, 2008 | 10:45 am
Redcarpet

Mariah who? Doesn't she know I am Richard Abowitz! That would be with an A as in apple and then B as in boy. OK, so what if I totally lack fame, that doesn't mean I am going to live on diva time. Of course, keeping people waiting, even to your own party, is what celebrities get to do in Vegas. VIPs can do most anything short of organize armed memorabilia recovery raids.

Last night Mariah Carey hosted a birthday party at Pure at Caesars for her husband, Nick Cannon. Then neither of them showed up. Well, they arrived but not on the day listed on the press release for the event, Tuesday, Oct. 7. Instead, according to a photographer who chose to wait for Ms. Carey, she finally arrived early this morning (Oct. 8) at about 12:30. Unlike me, most of the photographers arrived expecting to wait on the singer (no one seemed all that interested in her husband, birthday or not). The reason: these were mostly the same photographers she had kept waiting at a nightclub appearance this weekend at Bank at the Bellagio. And then the diva further irked the photographers by posing on the carpet for a very short time. The photographers also did not like how she posed.

Media photographers may sound like a fussy bunch (and they can be), but remember, they have deadlines, families and are people working late into the night. They do not get to enter the nightclub; they get no further than shooting the red carpet, and then they head off to send out the photos before finishing their night. So, after being kept waiting, they felt especially aggrieved not to have enough opportunity to get a good shot of Carey at Bank for all their patience. Remember, these are not stalking paparazzi like those who linger in front of restaurants in L.A. These photographers were invited and encouraged to cover Carey's appearances at Bank and Pure. And they were given times to be there. Indeed, for Pure last night, they were asked to check in at 10:30 for arrivals at 11. So, those who waited until when she arrived yesterday were left waiting for two hours before they got their photograph of Carey.

None of the print people who showed up last night were bothering to stand at the front with the photographers. No one had any expectation she would do interviews. Why were writers there, ready to hold an interview they know they won't get? It was Tuesday night and there was nothing else going on with a celebrity in her league that could yield a story.

Still, treating celebrity hosting like it is beneath her is the diva way; it speaks volumes that she both still does the work of multiple hosting gigs and also the offers to do so keep coming no matter when she arrives. And the photographers were mostly willing (indeed, required) to wait as they needed that shot of her. For the freelancers, their evening's pay depended on a photo of Carey.

The nightclub world is a complex anthropology of degrees of VIP services. One starting point for that division at Pure is the general admission and the separate, though almost as long, VIP line.  I decided to use the free time supplied by awaiting Carey's ultimate escorted VIP entrance to talk to the last person in the general admission line that wrapped around the club.

After some walking, I found the last person in line was Matt, 21, from Orlando, Fla. He wasn't even here for Carey, just to check out Pure. "I'll wait as long as it takes. We bought VIP tickets. We waited in the VIP line already and then they sent us over here." But of course VIP tickets don't mean you are a VIP in the sense that you wait in the VIP line. Doesn't everyone know that?

So, at 11 the daring thought hit me and I shared it with my media colleagues. Why don't I walk out on Mariah Carey if she is too late? She is working as a host and I am working as a reporter; how long before she is too late for work for me to waste more of my work time on waiting for her? Further, she is the host of a party she does not bother to get to early enough to greet her guests? Rude. And if she can't get excited enough to rush to her husband's birthday party with him, why should anyone else, especially me? I never heard of the guy.

So, why was I there? Well, like everyone else, it was Tuesday night and there wasn't any other celebrity of her magnitude in the offing. But there is no reason her time is more valuable than mine; there are limits. And so we waited out Tuesday; then Buffet photographer Sarah Gerke shot the empty red carpet Carey had yet to walk around midnight, and we left without looking back.

Hey, Mariah Carey, you aren't worth waiting for. And I spell my name A-B-O-W-I-T-Z. Wow, I like being a diva.

Photo credit: Sarah Gerke


TMZ.com and Angelique Morgan's vanishing boob shot

April 21, 2008 |  1:34 pm
Earlier today TMZ had a photo that appeared to show "Rock of Love 2" star Angelique Morgan flashing club goers from the VIP section of Pure nightclub at Caesars Palace.

While there are topless shows in Vegas resorts, those productions all require a special permit. Within a nightclub it is a big no-no to be topless. So, I immediately reached out to Pure and the response was interesting. When they got back to me an hour later, first off they informed me of Pure's policy:

"Pure Management Group has an absolute zero tolerance policy in regards to that sort of behavior and if we see it happening that person is immediately asked to leave and is not welcome back at any of our venues."

Then the spokeswoman asked with all innocence what photo I was speaking about?

Sure enough the incriminating photo is no longer on TMZ's site. Though comments for the original photo post remain on the site, now, a shot of Mary J. Blige has inexplicably turned up in the place of the original offending topless shot.

Most of the time TMZ has amazing exclusive shots from Pure. I wonder how they get those photos? And, why would they take down one photo that could cause hassles for Pure?

I've reached out to TMZ.com for comment on why the site removed the photo of topless Angelique Morgan.

Pure investigation unnerves Vegas from celebs to Fire Department

March 17, 2008 | 12:04 pm
Barber It is fascinating to see the Las Vegas media come at the story of the IRS investigation into Pure Management Group from so many perspectives that it could seem like piling on. It is not.

What is at stake is the image of Las Vegas in a perfect storm of issues that the Strip has tried hard to put in the past: money shenanigans, customers feeling bullied at resorts and, most important, making customers feel like they are being treated like marks while being financially strip-mined for cash.

Oh, and the overriding operating principal that the safety of tourists and employees is the first concern of every resort in Las Vegas. Then there is the belief that local officials charged with the crucial job of guaranteeing that remains true are always ready to stand-up to the mighty resorts of the Vegas Strip in the interest of public safety.

The key to Las Vegas has always been a certain straightforward greed. For example, the casinos set their slot machines in Vegas to hold roughly 2%-4% based on the machine. That means that for every $1 you stick into a slot, the machine is set up over time to return to you a few pennies less than you inserted. It adds up for the resort. But in the short term the customer can win money, a lot of money.
The problem is that if you keep playing long enough the resort will receive the hold. Therefore, the customers know they don't have an even chance.

Customers also know that winning requires that old abstraction -- luck -- to intervene against odds. But the casinos are bigger believers in odds than in luck. Yet for everyone involved to be comfortable with these numbers, the payout has to be straightforward and meticulous. And Nevada gaming regulators make sure that everything is transparent. Even the backgrounds of all those who work in a casino are supposed to be heavily vetted. This explains much of the coverage of the PMG-IRS issue over the last two days.

Review-Journal gossip columnist Norm Clarke tried to find out information on "growing tension" between PMG and celebrity investors like Celine Dion, Andre Agassi and Shaquille O'Neal.

On Sunday the Sun ran a detailed story on PMG managing parter Steve Davidovici that touched on his mysterious background. The Sun traced the history of protective orders issued and allegations made by  ex-wives and associates, as well as covering his civil case history. (...continued...)
Continue reading »

Greed is not an evil in Las Vegas

March 13, 2008 | 12:05 pm
Parishilton2 The investigation into Pure Management Group by the IRS remains the most underreported story in Vegas.

At first I thought I was one of the few people in the media grappling with the magnitude of the story despite the fact that it is all anyone is talking about.

Over just a few years the nightclub business went from the fringes to become the signature industry of the new Vegas. The IRS visit to Pure at Caesars and LAX at Luxor was the first such intervention inside a resort since the days of the mob in Vegas. And, though IRS investigations can move slowly, the existence of IRS agents working inside a property that holds an unrestricted gaming license is shocking.
 
But recently the Sun (the sister publication of Las Vegas Weekly where I am on staff) has done a series of stories on the practices of the Vegas club scene resulting in an editorial yesterday opining: "The whole thing smacks of unbridled greed." Sure it does. But greed, of course, is not an evil in Las Vegas. Dishonesty is the problem. In general, customers are supposed to know what they are facing from the greedy casinos. Odds are posted and the games aren't rigged in Vegas. Everything just favors the house; you know that before you start gambling. But the nightclub shakedown practices with customers documented in the Sun stories are far more insidious, demeaning and underhanded. As for any potential dishonesty with the IRS, well, that is another set of problems.
 
Meanwhile, The Review-Journal has left the story mostly in the hands of gossip columnist Norm Clarke who today makes clear, yet again, that while the media may not be focused on this story at least the casinos grasps the magnitude that any problems in the tenant clubs cause for them. According to Clarke: "A reliable MGM Mirage source says the repercussions from the IRS raid at Pure nightclub at Caesars Palace and LAX nightclub at Luxor are 'bigger than you can ever imagine. Change is an understatement.'" We will see.

Meanwhile things continue to run at the nightclubs much like before. Paris Hilton was partying at LAX on Saturday.
 

The chairman and the pita

February 27, 2008 |  3:35 pm
The most powerful name you have never heard in Las Vegas: Dennis K. Neilander. Neilander actually is based in northern Nevada, not Vegas. But that does not matter: He rules in Vegas because he is the chairman of the Gaming Control Board. It is the Gaming Control Board that is charged with policing the holders of Nevada's most precious treasure: an unrestricted gaming license. And Neilander and the board have a lot of discretion in how that is done. 
 
So, it was not lightly that I put in a call to the chairman's office to ask about the Gaming Control Board's view of the IRS investigation into nightclub company properties operated by Pure Management Group but located within licensee casino operators MGM-Mirage (Luxor) and Harrah's (Caesars).
 
I waited all morning for his call to tape the interview. But eventually hunger got the better of me and at around 2 this afternoon I ordered to-go food from Crazy Pita at the District at Green Valley Ranch. As I was walking out of the store, my pita secured, the chairman's assistant reached me on my cell and asked if I was available to speak to Chairman Neilander. There is only one answer to that question: yes.
 
So, this is from notes taken as my pita cooled.
 
Neilander is aware of the IRS visit to Pure and LAX. And, like me, he could not recall a time when the IRS has performed such a mission inside a licensed casino since the days of the mob. The Gaming Control Board exists to make sure Vegas does not revisit what is usually referred to more euphemistically as the old days.
 
That said, Neilander told me the Gaming Control Board is monitoring the situation but, he added, not actively investigating it: "As far as we know there is no gaming issue," he said.
 
It is Neilander's understanding that both MGM-Mirage and Harrah's are responsible for investigating, monitoring and controlling nightclub tenants. Should the IRS investigation result in accusations of wrongdoings involving money within the casinos, however, the Gaming Control Board will definitely have questions for the host resorts and expect there to be answers.
 
I asked Neilander how aggressive he expected resorts to be in terms of examining how tenant clubs are operating now, in the aftermath of the IRS investigation into Pure Management Group. But Neilander refused to draw a distinction between before and after the IRS investigation. Neilander reminded me that the resorts were responsible for doing due diligence before granting leases to clubs and for monitoring the clubs during the lease.
 
If the IRS investigations reveals that there were problems with how those operations handled cash, Neilander and the Gaming Control Board would be deeply concerned. 
 
And so Vegas continues to hold its breath as I toss my pita in the microwave.

Was Pure unpure?

February 25, 2008 |  7:41 pm

That is the question all Las Vegas is asking.

I am writing this item to update you on the IRS investigation into Pure Management Group, but also to give you some insight on the subtle judgments required in deciding what to report to you and what is trading in gossip. I tend to be very conservative in these matters.

I have spent much of the weekend reporting on the unfolding situation involving the IRS raid on Pure Management Group last week. That does not mean I am going to write a story about what I am hearing yet. I have promised before that I will not sensationalize this story, and I won't address the entire situation until I have documents and/or on-the-record interviews to back up the dark stories emerging.

But I also want to keep Buffet readers in the loop on what others are reporting in what could be a very big story in Las Vegas. Here is why: Any issue involving how money is handled inside a Nevada casino takes on an added significance that is unfathomable in its implications. Nevada authorities can hold casinos responsible for everything that goes on at their properties. So an investigation of Pure Management Group (operator of 10 nightclubs, lounges and restaurants in the tourist corridor), assuming it turns up serious wrongdoing -- a big assumption -- could result in fines, sanctions and lots of other trouble for the casinos renting them space. So far, of the Pure operations in Vegas, the IRS is known to have visited Pure at Caesars and LAX at Luxor. Therefore we are talking about parent companies Harrah's and MGM-Mirage, the two biggest players in town.

But so far no one has been accused of or charged with a crime or even of hiding a single penny from the IRS. And Pure Management Group issued this statement immediately after the IRS visit:

"Pure Management Group is fully cooperating with this IRS investigation and looks forward to a quick and satisfactory resolution. Until that time, we will have no further comment on this matter."

Since the raid, Pure properties like LAX at Luxor seem to be operating under a new normal.  Meanwhile, Norm Clarke in his column at the Review-Journal has some text messages that have been forwarded to him showing a certain shameful greed by nightclub employees. Other text messages I know are being forwarded to other reporters in town, including me. It is too loud to hear in nightclubs and so texting is often substituted for speech. That is a real bonus right now for us reporters, and probably investigators. But Norm also hints at the real dynamite in the PMG-IRS story:

"Shaken employees from several local clubs contacted me to say they participated in what they are convinced was questionable handling of cash night after night."

Norm does not define those practices of cash handling. Many people have discussed versions of those cash handling practices with me. I am not sure who to believe yet, and so I will keep working on this story until I am sure. In the meantime, all of Pure Management Group's restaurants and nightclubs are open for business. And I hear that the line folks are being a lot less demanding in terms of what it costs to get past the rope than they were last week at this time.

Continue reading »

Alert the press: Mel Gibson visits Pure

November 7, 2007 |  2:44 pm
Everyday I get press releases from the various nightclubs extolling what celebrities were present and what they did the night before with their time in the luxury of Vegas clubland.

Here is a typical example sent to me about Pure last night:
 
"Taking in the eclectic atmosphere at Pure on Tuesday night was New York Yankee slugger Jason Giambi. The former American League MVP sipped on Grey Goose Vodka and soda while relaxing with friends and mingling with several of his fans at a VIP table on the dance floor."
Interestingly, that same e-mail contains another celebrity sighting:
 
"Movie star and Oscar-winning director and producer Mel Gibson stopped by to party in style at the Caesars Palace hot spot. Gibson shared a posh VIP table on the main stage with a group of friends and danced to the sounds of DJ Hollywood all night long before heading back to his hotel room in the early morning hours."
 
So, Jason Giambi parties with vodka but Mel Gibson merely parties and dances about into the wee small hours "in style"?

For the information on what Mel Gibson was drinking until "the early morning hours" at a nightclub, apparently, Pure has decided to give Gibson his privacy. Good for them.
 
But sometimes the most interesting sentences in a press release are the ones left out.

Connection to Lohan's Pure adventure?

July 24, 2007 |  1:22 pm
ILindsaylohann her latest arrest, according to LA Times, there are allegations that her assistant's mom was the one calling police out of fear Lohan was chasing her car. That reminded me why Lindsay Lohan famously showed up at Pure early morning July 15 with her alcohol monitoring bracelet firmly encasing her ankle.  Lohan was here to go to the birthday party of her personal assistant, Jenni Muro. Here is a photo of them from that night at Pure during better days just over a week ago.


Update: TMZ is reporting that the incident involved one of Lohan's other assistants.
(photo courtesy Pure)


Nightclubs on the Strip are born

July 19, 2007 |  8:25 am
Lebron1_2 "Who knew standing still could be so exhausting?" I remember thinking at Pure around 2 AM on Wednesday morning. I was in the DJ booth with Hollywood and Vice watching them work the computers and turntables and the crowd. Nearby was basketball player LeBron James dancing up a storm to the delight of the crowd and, seemingly, himself. At some point, DJ Hollywood announced the arrival of Floyd Mayweather Jr., and earlier there had been a quick performance by rapper Too $hort.
 
Nightclubs have so transformed the Strip over the past few years that I forget what a baby business they are in Las Vegas. Pure, which is already an institution in Vegas, only opened on New Year's Eve 2004. The club's main competitor, Tao, came later. If fact, in a sort of belated fashion, on Tuesday, for the first time, Las Vegas actually got a legal definition and a few regulations on the books, specifically aimed at nightclubs on the Strip (as opposed to taverns, supper clubs, and banquet halls, etc). Clark County Commissioner, Chris Giunchigliani tells Review-Journal, "We never had a definition for nightclub. Now, we'll have one in connection with the resort corridor." And, so in essence, I was at Pure experiencing the first night in the official existence of the nightclub scene on the Strip. Perhaps, no one else knew the night was a birthday party, but no one else packed into Pure seemed to need an excuse to party.
(photo courtesy of Pure)


Advertisement

About the Bloggers

Recent Comments
 
RE: Movable Buffet: Final entry | comment by Peter
 
RE: Aubrey O’Day and Perez Hilton | comment by Jenna
 
RE: Movable Buffet: Final entry | comment by Blazingcatfur
 
RE: Movable Buffet: Final entry | comment by Ultan


Categories


Recent Posts
Movable Buffet: Final entry |  November 4, 2009, 1:05 pm »
Photos from Fangoria: Trinity of Terrors |  November 1, 2009, 8:45 am »
Oops, I am a tourist (and it's expensive) |  October 31, 2009, 10:00 am »
Fright Dome: Huge haunted houses at Circus Circus |  October 30, 2009, 11:47 am »

Archives