The Movable Buffet

Dispatches from Las Vegas
by Richard Abowitz

Category: Caesars Palace

Who paid for Obama's presidential suite?

May 28, 2009 |  1:53 pm

Scaled_e1243468741


I thought this would be a straightforward question to get answered. Who paid for President Obama's suite (pictured in the photo that accompanied the news release)? After all, when you put the president of the United States in a high-roller suite -- until the country elects a high-stakes gambler -- you can expect someone to ask: Who paid? Let me run through what happened when I asked that simple question, and then I will give you my explanation, which will probably disappoint political conspiracy theorists.

I called the PR firm for Caesars that sent the release to ask who paid for the president's 22,000- square-foot high-roller totally fabulous suite. I thought the choices were between the taxpayer and the Harry Reid campaign (the visit was a fundraiser for Reid). But the answer I got did not quite answer the question. Here is the response:

"President Obama’s hotel accommodations were included in the invitation to participate in Sen. Reid’s fundraiser."

To clear things up, I shot off a hastily written but I thought wiggle-room-proof follow-up question:

"Does that mean the Reid campaign paid or that Caesars comped the room or something else. I really only have the one question, Who paid for the suite the President stayed?"

The response, again, does not seemingly quite answer the question. In fact, the response seems to specifically avoid answering the question:

"The particular suite President Obama stayed in is priceless."

What does that mean?

Well, it probably means that Caesars only comps out the room to high rollers and occasionally major celebrities. Therefore the suite is literally "priceless," as the response indicates. (Though really that means the price would be roughly some guy who plays two hands of blackjack simultaneously at $45,000 a hand for three hours straight.) Obama falls into the major celebrity category (meaning Madonna and Oprah would rate the comp as well). Besides, if the suite was priceless before, imagine its singular worth -- being able to say to the biggest gamblers at the casino (and, high rollers are notoriously status- obsessed folk) with the offer of the comp: "The president slept here." How much is that worth to Caesars?

So, I do not think the taxpayers paid for the room. And, if the Reid campaign paid, then Caesars would have to create a dollar amount on a suite that is technically "priceless," which I again interpret to mean not for rent to the public like a regular hotel room.

So, did the president get special treatment? Yes, I think that is safe to say; President Obama was not like another citizen guest registering in the lobby and somehow lucking out on this room assignment. This was a major celebrity. And, of course, the real reason to draw attention to these sorts of rooms is always the whale players. And, the president has drawn a lot of attention to the room, even praising it while here.

Was the president likely comped, because the casino hoped to influence the nation's most powerful politician about, say, online gambling or some other issue? No way. I am guessing the president was likely comped for the most Vegas of reasons: because he is among the biggest celebrities in the world. Now, his name can be invoked and dropped to impress high rollers, leaving a tiny presidential gift to the Las Vegas economy.

Photo: Caesars Palace


The making of a presidential suite [Updated]

May 28, 2009 |  9:46 am

Scaled_e1243468741

The alleged feud between Las Vegas and President Obama has been silly.  It entirely consisted of two politicians, Mayor Oscar Goodman (a Democrat) and wildly unpopular Gov. Jim Gibbons (a Republican), taking comments by the president out of context. The president in passing suggested that banks taking bailout funds should not use taxpayer money to come to Vegas to make whoopee. This was interpreted by these politicians as an attack on the entire Las Vegas convention business, which it wasn't. Of course, the convention business dropped off at once, there being a huge recession and all, but you know whom the local politicians blamed.

I think the message is out there to people who book conventions that Las Vegas is a perfect place for serious conventions. I have covered so many conventions here that I no longer blink at the ones that don't "belong" in Vegas; there is no longer any irony to heading off to cover a convention of  religious leaders or the National Organization of Women on the Strip.  Why? You will not find a better spot in the country with more state-of-the-art equipment for meetings or a place so user-friendly with ways to structure a retreat, meeting or convention. Vegas is an ideology-free town. Conventions are business the Strip works hard to get and keep by arguing the merits of the services available and the ease of persuading attendees from all walks of life to come to Vegas. The Strip has proved its worth over the years as a perfect business destination for any industry or cause. No single comment is going to change that, and in this case, the president's comment was utterly taken out of context.

But obviously there is the other side of Vegas: nightclubs, gambling, nearby legal brothels and the party that never ends. And, Las Vegas proudly offers that to our tourists and indeed defines itself as the only place in the country that offers such a smorgasbord of naughty pleasures without a whiff of judgment. This perhaps came from the local libertarian quirks of Nevada history. But never has Las Vegas been a city that has expected endorsements from the establishment before. Don't tread on me has been a better motto for the view most Nevadans traditionally had when it comes to federal scrutiny and regulation. That obviously has changed. Can you imagine anyone expecting Ronald Reagan or Jimmy Carter to endorse Las Vegas? Maybe they did, as that was before my time. But I doubt it. Here is what Las Vegas got from the president: "There's nothing like a quick trip to Vegas in the middle of the week. Like millions of other Americans, we come to this beautiful city for the sights and for the sounds." I really doubt this will make companies schedule or cancel conventions, but at least this will silence our opportunistic local politicians.

Anyway, the clearest winner of the Obama visit was Caesars Palace, which put out a news release calling the casino the president's "resort of choice." Included with the release was a photo of the 22,000- square-foot suite Obama was assigned for his brief Vegas visit. Vegas being a young city, we have no hotel that can brag that George Washington slept here, like you see in the East. Even less distinguished presidents like, say, Warren G. Harding would have been chronologically eliminated from creating a "presidential suite" on the Strip, as there was no Las Vegas Strip during Harding's term. 

Updated at 10:08 a.m.: There is an Elvis suite at the Las Vegas Hilton, and President Clinton stayed at Four Seasons (that while connected to Mandalay Bay does not have gambling at the hotel). But Obama was in a suite that is meant for high rollers at the gambling resort, and nothing will impress a high roller more than being able to stay in the room that was good enough for the president.

Nowhere is the price the room costs to rent revealed in the news release, probably because room rates change in Vegas and now that Obama has spent the night there, that room is sure to be worth more. But the easiest way to get a room like that is to gamble a fortune and get the room comped or, of course, be president.

Photo: Caesars Palace


President Obama is no Celine Dion

May 25, 2009 |  3:35 pm

OBAM_AP_5_

Wow, President Obama is no Celine Dion (or Elton John). The president is making a special appearance Tuesday as headliner at a political benefit at The Colosseum at Caesars Palace, a room which John and Dion sold out for years, no problem. But despite an opening entertainment roster that includes musical performances by Rachel Yamagata, Sheryl Crow and Bette Midler (a current headliner in the room) along with comedy by Rita Rudner, demand for tickets to see the president apparently has not been overwhelming. For sure Tuesday is not sold out.  I just got this e-mail from the Nevada Democrtatic Party sent out as some sort of spam:

"A limited number of tickets to 'The Good Fight: A Tribute To Nevada’s Senator Harry Reid,' featuring special guest President Barack Obama, are still available for $50, $150 and $250.  You can purchase tickets at Caesars Palace Box Office today, Monday, from 11:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m."

What makes this extra weird is that I bet Crowe and Midler could sell out the theater without the baggage of the president. And Rudner does just fine night after night at Harrah's, though in a much smaller room. And while the prices may be high in your hometown, this is rock-bottom cheap for the Colosseum. Certainly in all her years in Vegas there were never any $50 Celine Dion tickets.

The man may be able to lead a nation, but the president (even with a puffed-out roster of opening acts) is obviously not ready to headline in Vegas.

Photo credit: AP


Is Celine Dion returning?

May 1, 2008 | 11:41 am
Celinedion Yesterday, Robin Leach broke on his blog a story that negotiations have begun to bring Celine Dion back to Caesars to headline again starting at the end of 2009 or early 2010. I reached AEG Live (which books the venue for Caesars) to get confirmation that it was in negotiations to return a Celine Dion show to Vegas. The official statement released to me:

"Right now Celine's focus is on her worldwide tour. We (AEG Live) begin the North American tour in August. We love Celine and always keep the door open for her to return to Las Vegas if she wishes."
That, of course, implies AEG Live is somehow too busy and Celine too focused with the immediate future to worry about the long-term future, which, of course, is nonsense. And also significant is that this does not answer whether AEG Live is negotiating with Dion's people to return the show to Vegas?

At least AEG Live is clear that the ball is in Dion's court about a return engagement. Of course, that has always been the case. Celine Dion was almost unique among Strip shows in that she closed "A New Day" while still able to sell out every performance.
So despite having time to send out a few score words of obfuscation (on what Celine is focused on, how much AEG loves Celine, when her North American tour starts, etc.), when it comes to trying to get a direct "yes" or "no" answer to the question of whether AEG and Dion are negotiating for a return to Vegas, it's: "The AEG spokespeople are unavailable to talk to you." (Photo by Sarah Gerke)


Oprah comes to Vegas

April 28, 2008 | 10:51 am
...and so it came to pass, the beloved corporate Gods smiled benevolently my way. The word went from Oprah's company, Harpo Productions, to the Harrah's corporation to the people at Caesars, who reached out to local public relations behemoth Kirvin-Doak, who had an account executive to call upon me late Friday night with the news that I would be granted a single ticket to see Saturday afternoon's "Oprah Winfrey Show" taping with guests Cher and Tina Turner at Caesars Palace. I had totally failed in earlier attempts to get a ticket. But I was also not the only media present. Also there was Steve Friess (USA Today and The New York Times), Doug Elfman (Review-Journal) and fellow blogger Robin Leach. Some were contacted as late as Saturday morning.

I won't bore you, the television-savvy audience of Los Angeles, with too many of the details from a television taping. I am sure you know them far better than I do. But to me many of them were so un-Vegas I was in awe.

For example, there was no attempt to sell people stuff by Oprah's people! I don't just mean that all the tickets were free -- with the huge caveat that you had to be connected in Vegas or Oprah-land to get one. (And on Harrah's side, the biggest caveat being, of course, one way to a precious ticket was to be a person who gambled a good sum at a Harrah's property.)

Still, this audience was in hero mode. And on the Oprah side this was the first time I saw the Caesars Colosseum's ample souvenir stand empty  Just imagine how many Oprah shirts, magazines or coffee mugs with inflated prices the worshipful audience would have snapped up. When the usher confused Steve Friess' ticket with mine, one lady begged us to let me sit in front of her like her life depended on it. Why? I am shorter. But instead the crowd of potential shoppers was left only with the nearby Bette Midler souvenir store. The other totally empty spot in the packed arena was the men's restroom: vacant enough for Buddhist meditation.

I also now know why five hours are required for taping a television show. There was an exhausting more than 40 minutes of preparation in which we had to react from "golf clap" to seeing "something cute." And we were told wear lots of lip gloss and to practice being excited before Oprah came out. Lots of stuff had to be shot twice.

The big moment was one such instance. Tina Turner was meant to break the news that she was ending retirement and going on tour. Instead, she wandered about the issue in an answer so convoluted that Oprah finally blurted out the applause moment. They reshot that so Turner could tell people succinctly she was returning to the road. No Vegas show announced.

I was most interested in Cher. She has a show opening next month in the room, and I was hoping for some preview of that show. We got that with Cher debuting a fully produced "Take Me Home" with live vocals. Cher is 61 only in the possible way you could look during your best dream. 

There will be plenty of showgirls in sequins and Bob Mackie gowns. It is going to be a quintessential Vegas show.

I think I earlier expressed reservations about Cher being able to move tickets and hold the spotlight in 2008 Vegas. Let me take my foot out of my mouth right now while I still have time before the show opens. Cher is going to be the biggest hit in Vegas since "LOVE." Tickets are going to be impossible to get, and she is going to cause as big a sensation as Celine Dion.

Midler's middling show

March 3, 2008 |  3:25 pm
Betteperformance1 On December 31, 1999, I was at the Mandalay Bay Events Center watching Bette Midler welcome in the new millennium. It was a show that was simply extraordinary for its old school, over-the-top Vegas entertainment value that has always been Midler's calling card among divas. Midler calls herself "the people's diva," and by that she means that she offers a knowing and ironic wink to her audience in stalwart characters like Delores Delago alongside her larger-than-life, manically self-centered "Divine Miss M" stage presence. So, the possibilities of what Midler could create here as a permanent Vegas show with a reported budget of $10 million was legitimately exciting.
But "The Showgirl Must Go On" is not Midler exploding her palette with a show whose outrageousness marks a culmination of her career efforts. Rather, "The Showgirl Must Go On" turns out to be a perfect title for an obligatory and mindlessly predictable super-sized version of a Bette Midler touring concert: a pastiche of the ballads and scripted routines that have worked for her in the past, with some Vegas touches added, including overlong shtick bits on Elvis and Wayne Newton. "The Showgirl Must Go On" offers nothing that will surprise longtime Midler fans, and, with the cheap seats going for $95, it is hard to imagine the appeal for the casual fan.
Be careful of the cheaper seats at the Colosseum for Midler's show too. If you are going to see Midler, get good seats. Unlike Celine Dion, Midler does not have her image up on the massive screen behind her on stage; and so the diva, in the words of one longtime fan in the nosebleed seats, was merely speck-tacular from there.
Also, unlike the immaculate Celine Dion, Midler's voice flattens out on a few notes; but to me, anyway, there was something wonderfully human about that. The more serious problem was Midler's choreography, though it was far more demanding than her predecessor's act; the effort is just not rewarded. Toni Basil's choreography for Midler is one of the most noticeably average aspects of the show. Basil features lots of chorus lines and big finishes that are thoroughly predictable long before they reach the BIG finish.
Fortunately, Midler is confident enough to ratchet down the visual circus on the big ballads, offering "The Rose" and "Hello in There" with all of the spotlight attention focused on her voice. The contrast creates goose-bump moments for fans, greater than a stage full of showgirls with $-sign headdresses (or Midler's own attempt at the world's largest headdress). Midler is still capable of seeming moved by her old hits, and she projects that emotion and feeling into the audience.
"The Showgirl Must Go On" is not a failure or unenjoyable. The grab-bag approach of this show is disappointing only if you expected something truly original and breathtaking and fun, not to mention fresh -- which may be unreasonable for an artist working through her fourth decade as an entertainer. But that is what I expected from Midler, based on her amazing 1999 show in Vegas. Instead, "The Showgirl Must Go On" is a familiar but inferior version of that earlier evening.
(Courtesy photo by Ethan Miller)

Will Vegas love Cher?

February 8, 2008 | 12:08 pm
Collosseum It has been close to a year since my colleague Robin Leach first blogged about rumors that Cher would be joining Elton John and Bette Midler as a headliner at the Colosseum at Caesars Palace. Even before the Midler show was announced, Cher's name was in the mix. Now, with Midler's "The Showgirl Must Go On" opening February 20, the official announcement of Cher's residency was finally made.
 
Cher last said goodbye to Las Vegas an epic four times on her "farewell" tour between 2002 and 2005. Cher's drawing power is going to be tested starting May 6 with 200 shows set to take place over the next three years, with prices ranging from $95 to $250. If things go well, expect more shows to be added, because as the  Review-Journal's Mike Weatherford notes, "The first stint that runs through May 31 offers four shows per week, leaving room for the singer to add more if she chooses."

 
I am going to go out on a limb and guess that Cher will prove the first hard sell among Colosseum headliners. Celine Dion proved a monstrous success. Her "A New Day" really did mark a new beginning for Vegas headliners. Elton John's show, if anything, is even more successful. Bette Midler certainly lacks the numerous hits of Dion or John, but she has spent decades doing almost vaudevillian concert tours that seem a perfect match for Vegas.

Obviously, as Cher tells Mike Weatherford, "Las Vegas is over the top, and the show I do is way over the top. I feel that it just has to be." Maybe so. But there are so many shows in Vegas built around spectacle that cost less, and how much of Cher's singing will be live? Audiences are far more sophisticated about vocal tricks of the concert trade than they were just a few years ago. Time will tell.
 
Now, if I can turn back time (yeah, not funny), check out this old-school YouTube clip of the three headliners of Caesars Palace (Elton John, Bette Midler and Cher) doing a medley of songs including "Proud Mary." (Photo by Sarah Gerke)
 

 

 


Hail Caesars Palace

August 4, 2006 | 11:28 am

Caesars Palace is celebrating its 40th anniversary on Saturday. The resort is routinely called the best brand name in Vegas. Just five years ago though, Caesars seemed to be coasting on its good name and the place was about as run-down as a high-end property could get away with being.

The Palace was becoming ruins: the conveyor belts and escalators were frequently out of order, the main valet was to be avoided, and a double bill of Chuck Berry and Little Richard was about as hip and new school as entertainment got. I definitely would have bet against Caesars and I would have been totally wrong. Caesars is once again a must for any shortlist of hot properties. How did they do it? By investing in the property (and since Caesars was bought by Harrah's in the midst of these changes there is a lot of credit to go around).

Entertainment was the first to be transformed with "A New Day" (2003) and "The Red Piano" (2004). Celine Dion and Elton John were not the most adventurous choices as headliners; yet both have proven to be fantastic and reliable draws since opening. Elton John's show is even good. And, though success has made everything look easy, the original decision to bring on Celine (and construct a theater for her customized right down to the Wolfgang Puck snack bar) was a far more daring business decision than any of her airless music. It has totally paid off.

Next up was a hip nightspot worthy of a massive resort. In 2005, Pure nightclub filled that bill by offering essentially three separate nightclub rooms (a model becoming increasingly standard) all with wide gradations of VIP access. Meanwhile, the dining, too, has been getting a high-end makeover. In this area, my budget keeps me somewhat ignorant. But the rich folks speak well of Bradley Ogden and these days they're breathlessly excited about Restaurant Guy Savoy, which opened in May.

Restaurant Guy Savoy falls outside the Movable Buffet budget. But after reading this description from the resort's corporate website, I am not that disappointed:

"Van Gogh expressed himself with paint, while Beethoven shared his brilliance with the world through the piano. Guy's canvas is your plate, and he bares his soul with culinary creations..."

Nothing against Beethoven and Van Gogh, but imagining their creations as food conjures thoughts too dark, distorted and brooding for my delicate taste buds. Who is the Diane Arbus of chefs? The Francis Bacon for foodies?

It's almost too much to ponder. Instead, I'd rather share some of my favorite Caesars memories and experiences:

Continue reading »

T.O. to Party at Pure

January 19, 2006 |  7:41 am
Terrellowens_iqf919kn Terrell Owens has been hired to host the Super Bowl party at Pure Nightclub in Caesars on Friday, February 3. The press release refers to Owens as an "NFL star." I am certainly no expert in football, but isn't he more like an unemployed guy?
(photo by Jack Dempsy/AP)

Elton John's Red Piano on the Small Screen

December 12, 2005 |  8:59 am
Eltonjohnredpiano_ii5703kn Tonight at 8 PM  on NBC stations you can see highlights of a performance of Elton John's The Red Piano recorded live at the The Colosseum at Caesars Palace. The Red Piano is the most expensive ticket in Las Vegas. Certainly, the television version will be no substitute for the real thing. But I love Elton John's show and regret only its cost and brevity (The Red Piano is a mere 90 minutes that barely scratches John's career). Still, this is a good way to taste the experience for free, and decide if it is worth spending $250 for a ticket.
(photo by MICHAEL CAULFIELD/PRN)


Advertisement

About the Bloggers

Recent Comments
 
RE: Movable Buffet: Final entry | comment by Peter
 
RE: Aubrey O’Day and Perez Hilton | comment by Jenna
 
RE: Movable Buffet: Final entry | comment by Blazingcatfur
 
RE: Movable Buffet: Final entry | comment by Ultan


Categories


Recent Posts
Movable Buffet: Final entry |  November 4, 2009, 1:05 pm »
Photos from Fangoria: Trinity of Terrors |  November 1, 2009, 8:45 am »
Oops, I am a tourist (and it's expensive) |  October 31, 2009, 10:00 am »
Fright Dome: Huge haunted houses at Circus Circus |  October 30, 2009, 11:47 am »

Archives