Top 50 hookers in Vegas?
Just as the mayor was agitating to legalize prostitution downtown, the police have begun one of the most elaborate crackdowns on hookers in the history of the Strip. The program is called VETO (Vice Enforcement Top Offenders) and has gathered up the names of the 50 women whom police describe as "the most prolific prostitutes" in Vegas.
The Review-Journal has a partial list with photographs of the women here. But there are some problems. First you will notice that a number of women have been charged with trespassing or loitering and not prostitution. The casinos have banned the women and they returned. Prostitution was not directly involved in most of the arrests the program is taking credit for making. And that points to the main problem with VETO: It is only touching on one small part of the illegal prostitution that is everywhere in Vegas. These hookers are the ones who hang out in hotels looking for customers, and therefore are the most visible prostitutes to tourists; they are the Strip version of streetwalkers. For that reason this reeks of being a show pony for media rather than a serious attempt to really crack down on the activity.
For example, nothing in this program is meant to catch casino hosts who supply high rollers with hookers for kickbacks from the hookers. Also, there is a huge and thriving Internet community of escort prostitutes who work through websites that even contain consumer reviews by customers that also escapes targeting by this program.
The Internet escorts, like the prostitutes who work with casino hosts, do not loiter at a resort or search for customers at the casino but are already going to meet the john through arrangements made by phone and e-mail.
VETO therefore is really only targeting the women who show up at a casino looking for customers. There are plenty of them. But they are probably not, as advertised by police, "the most prolific" prostitutes in Vegas. And what they do is just a tiny part of the illegal prostitution that takes place on the Strip daily and nightly.



You have some interesting points in your article, Richard. But I don't see it and I get the impression LVMPD is looking at it a lot differently than you are.
LVMPD seems to be approaching the problem the same way that the casinos approach it; but looking at it as trespassing and trying to keep them away. Because, in the past, their "sting operations" and "p*#%y posse round ups" have not worked. It's just a way of going at it differently.
And yes, this does not solve all the problems such as escorts, whether their services are summoned by tourists and/or casinos. But you know what? You gotta start somewhere, Richard. And LVMPD appears to be doing something to fix it, and it may be baby steps, but they are trying, no matter if people want them to eradicate this problem or not. But you have to admit the approach is novel by trying to make a "No Hook Zone."
As mentioned in the LVRJ article (but overlooked and not commented about much) is the fact that out of these identified women, probably a good majority of them participate as "trick rollers." Trick rollers always operate under the law enforcement radar because they target and pick up on married "johns" who they know won't press charges if they rip them off, for fear their wife they are cheating on finds out. Most prostitutes want to get the money without having to give out anything for it. Their pimps highly encourage any method that achieves this end to get the money also.
This initiative to trespass them because they are in a posted and clearly defined corridor along the Strip is just something to strive to be more proactive and approach it from another angle. And it makes sense. Because all the other ways of trying to stop prostitution don't work. And LVMPD threw a new twist on it by posting pictures of the real nuisance ones. And I guarantee these pictures are posted with casino security to assist in getting rid of them. So, it may prove to be successful because you have everyone working from the same sheet of paper to eradicate it...both police and casino security.
I'm not sure about your contention that it coincides with the controversy about legal prostitution in Las Vegas. I say it probably isn't and the timing is just coincidental. Because LVMPD does routine "stings" and "round ups" along the Strip to chase the prostitutes off and discourage the "johns." One thing this does reap benefits for is to assist in attracting to Las Vegas....in that efforts are being made to make the Strip more safe.
I guess there is a point made somewhere that prostitution is a victimless crime, but it sure seems to lead to other things like drugs, disease, murder, robbery, etc. And it HAS to be enforced, whether people want it enforced or not. Look back at the incident that occurred about two years ago at the Mandalay Bay where a local prostitute was murdered on the 22nd floor and the body left in the hallway by a "john" (and the guy subsequently confessed and caught in Los Angeles and sent back for trial). And this effort by LVMPD is smart to try to clean it all up and provide a valuable service to the tourists as well as the casinos. Besides an effort to make their job easier so they aren't responding to murder scenes more and more. LVMPD is put in a position to provide for tourists' safety, whether they want it or not. And I'm sure the casinos appreciate this too. Because after all tourism is the lifeblood of Las Vegas.
I do know they have an uphill battle though. Every large city in the world has the same problem in trying to get rid of the world's oldest profession. Las Vegas makes it even harder...mainly because of their ad campaigns that hint at sex, sex, sex. In the long run, this may only prove to be an attempt to fight a charging lion armed with only a toothpick.
One thing I do know from the past, the only thing that chases a hooker from the Strip? And it's a guarantee? Rain. When it rains, they disappear. It's sorta like a cat. They can't stand getting their fur wet. So, maybe these new initiatives, along with a lot of rain showers, may prove to be successful.
Posted by: ColinFromLasVegas | February 16, 2009 at 01:54 PM
While I can understand Colin's point its a start, I will say this, the belief that prostitution is some rampant crime wave or has to be regulated or enforced is bs. Heck just look north to Canada where they have legal prostitution,. that isn't required in a brothel or some other regulated establishment. I just find it funny that people talk about the breakdown that legalization would bring or point out one or two high profile examples to argue against it. I'm not advocating it, and unfortuntely there isn't anything we can debate about nowadays that falls outside of the status quo, that's not filled with mis-information.
Posted by: Jinx | February 17, 2009 at 07:30 AM
Good point, Jinx.
I look at this pretty much like Las Vegas Metro Police Department (LVMPD) looks at it. Sure, there probably is a case to legalize prostitution and it will increase tax revenue, make it safer for everyone, blah blah blah, but we're dealing with the here and now. LVMPD cannot factor in intangibles.
And the here and now is that LVMPD operates according to the law and is confined to that. And the law now is that prostitution is illegal in Clark County. And I would bet that LVMPD has the statistics to back it up that they needed to do something. If they were to wait for people to jump up and down about legalizing it, waiting patiently for this law to change, don't do anything about the prostitution problem on the Strip as it stands now, and their crime statistics snowball out of control in this area because of the various off shoot crimes resulting from it, they are doing everyone an injustice by turning a blind eye and not trying to be proactive and stay on top (forgive the pun) of the existing problem.
And yes, I guess there is a moral point that if a married man comes and solicits a "trick roller" and subsequently gets ripped off, most people probably say that is justice and he deserves what he gets...shame on him for cheating on his wife. On a moral level, I agree with this reasoning. But, in the real world, LVMPD, like any professional police department in any large city in the U.S. or around the world, cannot operate like that. Those types of victims are to be protected. Not their fault they are not a shining example of a victim.
So, it seems like minds have got together and they are doing something that's never been done before in Clark County. Whether it's the right way of going about it? Will it make a difference? Will it clean up the Strip? Don't know. We'll see. But like I said, it's a start.
Posted by: ColinFromLasVegas | February 17, 2009 at 10:05 AM
Heya fellas, don't knock great work if you find it.
How else can I make a great living feeding my baby and P A R T Y too.
I work a few clubs off the vegas strip, LAX and ROK
I have more work than I can handle
Posted by: Giselle_Diaz | February 17, 2009 at 12:58 PM
I think that it is fair game for any business to not want that sort of clientale or solicitation inside their buildings. I can definitely understand where a family may find it offensive for that to be right in front of their faces. Now Vegas may not be the best place for Family Vacations... or is it? Either way, I think that a crackdown like this is helpful. I bet there are some funny conversations overheard in Vegas... especially in reference to prostitution.... Check out http://www.hearditinvegas.com.
Posted by: HearditinVegas.com Admin | February 21, 2009 at 11:15 AM
I make it to Vegas once a month for one week. The El Cortez was the worst place I had ever been in. The place was crawling with $150 hookers. Believe me when I say that 150 dollar hookers were not the best lookin'. One was loud (had a gravely voice) and talked to all the security. She was gambling on the penny slots and had three bucks on her. I walked in (with my bags) and she was all over me. Damn I knew I shouldn't have taken the limo to the casino). I hadn't even been to my room yet and security was telling me that buying a hooker is illegal. I told them that she was on me when I got in the door. I did not want anything to do with her. Did security tell her to keep away from me? Nope. They just kept telling me that it was illegal in the county. I was there an hour and checked out. Went to the Golden Nugget. Mr. Gaughn will not get any of my money.
Posted by: vegasgambler | August 30, 2009 at 07:20 PM