The Movable Buffet

Dispatches from Las Vegas
by Richard Abowitz

Category: May 2008

| The Movable Buffet Home |

Palms Place to open without Britney

May 30, 2008 | 11:44 am
Img_0436 After two meetings with owner George Maloof at Palms, an international media storm of speculation formed around whether Britney Spears was planning a comeback at the casino. Maloof,  exclusively on the Buffet, described those meetings as being about their friendship with no business being discussed.

On Saturday, Maloof's Palms Place opens officially. This much anticipated opening is striving to attract global media attention. One person who has a strong interest in the opening getting a lot of coverage is Spears' business manager, Larry Rudolph. Rudolph is an owner of Sunset Tan at Palms Place. Speculation has been that, with Spears being a friend of Maloofs and connected to Rudolph, we could expect her to be in Vegas on Saturday night. I e-mailed Rudolph and asked him if Spears planned to attend the opening. His answer was unequivocal: "She's not coming to Vegas this weekend."

Here, from the media press release, is the list of more modest celebrities expected to attend, the biggest names being Jessica Simpson and Luke Wilson:

"Ashley Scott (“Jericho”), Eve, Donald Faison (“Scrubs”), Jessica Simpson, Ian Ziering (“Dancing With The Stars”), Lauren “Lo” Bosworth (“The Hills”), Lauren Conrad (“The Hills), Lisa Rinna (“Dancing With The Stars”), Luke Wilson, Michael Vartan ("Monster in Law"), Pete Wentz, Robert Iler (“The Sopranos”), Romany Malco ("The Love Guru"), Sarah Larson, Stephen Colletti (“The Hills"), Verne Troyer ("The Love Guru")."

(photo by Sarah Gerke)

Breaking news: Toni Braxton show canceled

May 29, 2008 |  8:36 pm
Tonibraxton_2 Toni Braxton's show at the Flamingo has been canceled. The show was first interrupted by health problems faced by the singer before an April 7 performance. The show, which opened in August 2006 to mixed reviews, was set to run until August of this year. According to the press release just issued:

“Upon learning several weeks ago of Ms. Braxton’s health concerns, our first and foremost consideration was her well-being,” said Don Marrandino, president of Flamingo Las Vegas. “We have truly enjoyed having her as our resident headliner and continue to wish her a full and quick recovery so that she may resume doing what she loves best, entertaining audiences.”
Braxton's show never really caught fire in Vegas. On the other hand, the wraparound advertisement on the Flamingo promoting her show was a sensation and has inaugurated a tradition of familiar but inferior wraps at the Flamingo and other properties.
Braxton's lasting contribution to Vegas may be this marketing technique of covering billions of dollars of architecture with cheap advertising. That long shot for Braxton worked. In fact, the Flamingo was said to get frequent request for rooms with windows at strategically placed body parts of the singer.
(Photo by Sarah Gerke)

Tropicana: A good price costs lots of patience

May 28, 2008 |  5:49 pm
Escalator I am spending tonight at the Tropicana for a story for Las Vegas Weekly and to see Folies Bergere for the Buffet.  The bankrupt casino is sure letting customers feel the pinch of its reduced workforce. Wednesday is one of the slowest nights of the week in Vegas and it still took an hour of waiting in line to check in. To make matters more frustrating, there were plenty more check-in windows available -- more space closed than open, in fact. There were just not enough employees to check guests into their rooms. This was similar to the wait I had at Luxor on New Year's Eve. But again, this is a typical Wednesday afternoon. The wait should have been five minutes. Most resorts want their customers gambling and not waiting to check in for their first hour on property. But Tropicana does not have enough staff working up front to make that practical today.

As soon as I checked into my room, I went to examine the escalator that leads to Bodies: The Exhibition. When I visited Tropicana back in December for the Buffet to check on conditions here (after I had heard some horror stories),  I wrote about how that key escalator to Bodies was broken.

I was curious, with all these months to work on fixing this escalator since December, if I would find the repair finally completed. After all, an escalator allowed to sit around broken endlessly says something about the care and money being put into a property. Sure enough, the escalator is still out of order and has even grown some advertising. There is a sign offering a line pass where people should be entering to take the escalator down to the exhibit. Any surprise Bodies is moving to the Luxor?

And, I wonder, after a vacation spent dealing with out-of-order escalators and waiting in lines, how long it will be before customers decide that a discount room at the Tropicana has too many discomforts to still be a bargain? (Photo by Richard Abowitz)
 


Ultimate Fighting Championship vs. Movable Buffet

May 27, 2008 | 11:23 am

Tito One local journalist who covered Saturday's Ultimate Fighting Championship card at MGM's Grand Garden Arena wrote me an e-mail, offering this impression:  "UFC attempts to be more controlling than other sports. UFC sounds like it's trying to hem in media."

We were discussing his experience as well as the credential application that UFC demanded that I sign to be approved to cover the fight. The application specified everything from the trivial, forbidding my wearing certain clothes, to the ridiculous, controlling where and when I was allowed to write about the event forever more. In explaining this bizarre credential application that most would call not an application but a contract, UFC events manager Diann Brizzolara wrote me: "We have the right to protect our brand and how coverage taken from our events is disseminated." Actually, UFC does not have that right to control "how coverage taken...is disseminated" at all. This rather unique privilege in fact is what the credential application is trying to give them a back door claim to having. Brizzolara continued, "Other sports leagues, such as the NFL, have similar regulations printed on the back of their press passes." Two points: Similar isn't identical, and regulations on the back of a press pass are a wish list because they do not require my signature of agreement. Oh and the obvious, the UFC is no NFL.

Interestingly, in another e-mail, Brizzolara also wrote to me defensively that the UFC credential application was "actually reviewed by our COO (who also has a law degree)."  Huh?  Who is the COO's client: UFC or media?

Credential applications are supposed to be basic as they are designed to confirm only the legitimacy and assignment of media to an event. The standard application answers two questions: is this writer a legitimate journalist and does the writer have an assignment? Since it is an application and not a contract, it is therefore revealing that UFC felt the need to have this routine document examined by a COO with a law degree.

By the way, the writer I was exchanging e-mails with who covered this weekend's fight was not asked to sign any credential application. He was not even told that the application existed. Like me, he would never sign such a form. Could it be that UFC has a problem with the Buffet? Not according to an MGM spokesperson: "He [the other writer] had tickets to the event and no credential." Of course, that offer of review tickets without a credential was never made to me.

But why would UFC have any problems with the Buffet? Certainly this was not the case two years ago, the last time I covered a UFC fight. At that time, there was no discussion of a credential application at all.

Of course, since then I have attempted to question famously touchy UFC head Dana White about his issues with fighter Tito Ortiz and Jenna Jameson, pictured. That request for an interview with White was at first rebuffed and then ignored. Now, when it comes to me, a credential application with all sorts of stipulations is required for a press pass. I wonder what they are so worried about?

Here is one possibility: if credentialed, I would have been there this weekend to view the after-fight press conference fight. According to Robin Leach's blog, that press conference turned into such a fiasco with such vitriol and chaos that the police were called and "UFC officials immediately ended the press conference." Eventually order was restored and the press conference resumed.

So, was the problem caused by two emotionally high-strung fighters who could not settle it in the ring? No. Once again the situation was apparently a conflict between White and Ortiz and Jameson. Apparently, White wanted Ortiz at the press conference about as much as he wanted me there.

Of course, next time, I can always just buy a ticket and go blog about the UFC event. But that might not be necessary. UFC's moment may be passing anyway. Ortiz, the league's biggest star, now is done with UFC, and the league is facing increased competition.

On his blog, Leach also reports about speculation on the future of Ortiz and for White's UFC: "Will Tito join a rival Mixed Martial Arts league or retire and how will White take on his more bitter rivals in the XC Extreme Sports league that starts its CBS TV network coverage next Saturday night from Newark, New Jersey. If a ratings success I am reliably told three further fights would be broadcast live from Vegas."

And, of course, network fights on CBS are likely to get many more viewers than pay-for-view and cable fights. That would begin to make UFC obsolete even as it approaches mainstream status. When I first wrote about a UFC fight in 2006 that league was bringing unprecedented attention to mixed martial arts. But maybe now it is time for the next big sensation. I wonder if EliteXC requires select press to sign a credential application?

UPDATE: An MGM spokesperson writes: "I can clarify the incident about the post-fight press conference -- there was NO incident at all -- the officers were simply there to monitor the situation in the event anything got out of control. Everything was fine and so you know they attend every event we have whether it's boxing, UFC or concerts."

(Photo by Sarah Gerke)




Breaking Buffet exclusive: Maloof on the 'secret' meetings with Britney Spears

May 23, 2008 | 10:18 am
Georgemaloof Whatever you are reading elsewhere is not true. Palms owner George Maloof granted by phone an exclusive interview this morning with the Buffet on the subject of his two recent meals with long-time friend Britney Spears. The result of those encounters with Spears has been widespread media speculation across the world that Spears intends either a Vegas show at the Palms  or is talking with Maloof about mounting a $10-million world tour. There has even been speculation the two are dating. But in a brief conversation, Maloof, who is suffering from a cold, dismisses all of the stories as untrue, telling the Buffet unequivocally and exclusively:  "Britney and I have been friends for a long time. I've been seeing her as a friend. We haven't spoken about business."
(Photo by Sarah Gerke)




Remember Tiffany?

May 22, 2008 |  2:01 pm

Tiffany3 I usually don't post promotional photos sent out by nightclubs. But this shot of '80s pop star Tiffany performing Tuesday night at MGM's Studio 54 seems so very Ghost of Christmas Yet to Come for today's nightclub stars that I thought I would share.

(Photo courtesy MGM Mirage)


Psychics and skeptics coming to Vegas

May 22, 2008 | 10:34 am

John_edward One of the stranger aspects of Vegas entertainment has been the return of supposed mind readers and psychics to Strip showrooms. And, to me, worst of all, back in Vegas are the people who claim power to communicate with the dead and then sell that as entertainment. As dubious as entertainment this may be, cheap the experience is not. The ticket prices for the top entertainers in the supernatural circuit beat out even most of the top ticket prices of Cirque's five shows on the Strip.

Today through Saturday, for example, professional future-predictor Sylvia Browne will be performing at Excalibur, with a top ticket price of $137.50. Even more expensive is the bring-out-your-dead clairvoyant entertainer, John Edward, who will be at the Flamingo at  $175 for the top ticket.

In case you can't tell from my tone, I am very uncomfortable with entertainment that proclaims to predict the future or to offer communication to people's lost loved ones. This is religion or at least faith that is being packaged and sold as entertainment in Vegas. We have built a city for tourists' amusement, and the Strip should never be confused as a spiritual haven where wisdom is dispensed from its showroom stages.

Even if you believe John Edward is sincere, how is it righteous to charge people desperate for a message from those they have lost in life $175 for a ticket? This does not, by the way, even guarantee that he will call on you in the audience.

Anyway, by one of those coincidences that inspires faith, the James Randi Educational Foundation will be following John Edward to the Flamingo next month when Randi holds his annual skeptics convention to support his foundation. Amazing Randi's foundation is most famous for its Million Dollar Challenge, which offers $1 million to anyone who can demonstrate paranormal powers under scientific conditions and protocols. Actually, Browne agreed to take Amazing Randi's challenge in 2001. What happened? To this day on his website, Amazing Randi keeps track as the years tick by and Browne has yet to fulfill her promise.  Maybe Amazing Randi can come to the Flamingo a bit early this year for the convention and we can finally get the issue resolved with Browne?

Meanwhile, John Edward has refused to take the foundation challenge. That is smart of him. Why would he take the challenge? I mean, on the up side, if he passes, he would get $1 million and show scientists that there really is another world where the dead live. He would also undermine the entire community of skeptics by having famed debunker Amazing Randi proclaim his supernatural powers are authentic. He could make doubters like Christopher Hitchens and Richard Dawkins cry in misery and failure, not to mention have the pleasure of telling that smug atheist Penn Jillette, "I told you so!" It might even cause a spiritual revolution in this country. In fact, if Amazing Randi authenticated John Edward's "powers," nothing but great things for the entire world would come from passing the test. It would sure beat a gig at the Flamingo.

Of course, there is a possible downside for Edward if he fails the test. Edward is reasonable if not psychic enough to know the outcome if his ability to talk to the dead were to be tested by the James Randi Educational Foundation. Right now people will line up to pay $175 for the chance that he may call on them in a sold-out showroom at the Flamingo. How many would still come if he failed the challenge?

(Photo by Sarah Gerke)


Angel: to ask or not to ask

May 22, 2008 | 10:34 am
Crissangel To ask or not to ask, that is the question.
As I predicted the questions surrounding Criss Angel's threat to the Review-Journal's Norm Clarke at the Miss USA pageant in April have continued to cloud the public unveiling of Angel's new $100-million Cirque du Soleil show, "Believe." Cirque and Angel held a special press function Saturday to promote the show. I was not invited. Also not invited was Steve Friess (from USA Today and New York Times) who recently asked Angel about the incident with Clarke on a red carpet. Clarke was not there either.

But the Review-Journal's show reviewer and entertainment feature writer Mike Weatherford was among the select few chosen to interview Angel. Amazingly, he did not ask Angel to address the situation regarding his Review-Journal colleague. I e-mailed Weatherford to find out why he refrained from asking the obvious questions about the Miss USA incident? To his credit, Weatherford wrote back almost at once:

"This hasn't been actively discussed, but I think it has gone unsaid that since Norm and I mostly work independently already, I need to keep doing my thing (cover this show all the way through its opening) and let him do his. Besides, the interviews weren't one-on-one and there was a sense of the meter running in the presence of Kats (John Katsilometes, Las Vegas Sun) and the AP on my side of the table, and the show's director and choreographer on the other, none of whom would probably appreciate the limited window of time sidetracked by Norm talk."

I still would have asked about the situation; yet, I understand Weatherford's decision. The editor he works for asked for a story on the new Cirque show and not on the show's star's spat with Norm Clarke. I am sure if Weatherford were doing a feature-length profile of Angel, then he would have asked about the issue. Because in trying to understand Criss Angel in a profile, his behavior that night raises major questions about the man Cirque is investing $100 million into showcasing on the Strip.

As I said, these questions will continue to haunt Angel because his behavior continues to go unexplained by himself, Cirque or MGM-Mirage (owner of Luxor, the show's host property). One of those questions: How can threatening to poke an eye out of a reporter be seen as acceptable behavior for a Strip headliner by his partners in "Believe" (two of the most respected corporations in town, MGM-Mirage and Cirque)?

Meanwhile I have spoken to three witnesses to the encounter with Clarke and they all essentially offer the same account of Angel's behavior. In fact, no one has directly disputed the accuracy of Clarke's account of that night. If Angel threatened Clarke, as Clarke claims and the witnesses I spoke to agree,  and Angel continues to refuse to either retract the threat or offer any explanation, how can the story go away? And, if Angel wishes to continue avoiding discussing that night, that means each press event will need to be further controlled, with fewer press members invited. The problem won't end until enough time has passed that people no longer want an explanation from Angel. How long that will be is anyone's guess.

Certainly that moment has not even come close to arriving. Steve Friess, for example, strongly argues on his blog that Weatherford's decision not to ask Angel about the incident was baffling. Here is why. Weatherford wrote a response on his own blog to Friess here further defending his decision not to ask Angel about the Norm Clarke controversy.

Clearly there are those in the media who think Angel should be asked about this incident at every event, by every responsible reporter, until there is an explanation given. That must be disconcerting to those investing $100 million in his show, which opens in just a few months. 

Bottom line: as "Believe" nears opening in September, there is as much interest in Angel's seemingly erratic behavior as their is anticipation of his show. This was not the case when "Believe" was announced. (photo by Sarah Gerke)

Angel speaks out on feud with local journo

May 19, 2008 | 12:07 pm

Crissangel Criss Angel has finally commented publicly on the ugly spat between himself and Review-Journal's Norm Clarke that happened after the Miss USA pageant in April. During the incident, Angel threatened the eyesight of Clarke. He then ignored opportunities to deny or retract the threat. Yesterday, on the red carpet for the Academy of Country Music Awards, Steve Friess asked Angel about the incident. On his blog, Friess transcribes their brief exchange:

Friess: Are you planning to apologize for the threat you made against Norm Clarke of the Review-Journal?

Angel: The problem is, some people got their lines crossed. And if some people got the whole story, they would see that what he wrote is actually not what really happened. So there’s nothing to apologize for.

Friess: What really happened?

Angel: I’d need awhile to explain that to you and now is not the appropriate time.

The appropriate time, of course, would have been immediately after the incident. If Angel has a story to tell at any point, he can still offer it; then there will not be more of these awkward red carpet encounters. And there will be more. In fact, the questioner could have as easily been me, if I had been covering ACM's red carpet instead of the Helldorado Days Parade. I am sure I will run into Criss Angel soon and get my chance to ask. And I wonder what questions Norm Clarke might have for Angel on the next red carpet those two meet?

Angel has created a public relations nightmare for himself that with his Cirque show set to open in September, many in Vegas are still interested in his threat to Clarke and other ugly behavior attributed to him during the Miss USA contest back in April.

(Photo by Sarah Gerke)


Helldorado Days Parade

May 19, 2008 | 11:33 am

Oscargoodman In many ways Saturday night's Helldorado Days Parade in Las Vegas could have been any small town. It was hosted by the Las Vegas Elks. An honor guard of firefighters took the lead in dress uniforms with flags. There were high school marching bands, chanting Girl Scouts groups, the Shriners in their little buggies and community groups that I never heard of, such as the Nevada Gay Rodeo Assn.

The Helldorado Days Parade claims to be the oldest tradition in Las Vegas, boasting a 103-year-old legacy. Of course, like most truths about Vegas, there is some fudging around the edges. For example, the parade was discontinued for a while in the '90s, has been moved (the Fremont Street Experience stands on part of one old parade route) and shrunk and, finally, perhaps to attract more people, moved into the evening (avoiding the necessary heat-braving attitude implied in the Helldorado Days name).

And, like everything about Vegas, Helldorado was a tradition originally created to bring tourists to Las Vegas. Helldorado Days was started in 1935 after the completion of the Hoover Dam (and the departure of thousands of workers who built the project) caused the city fathers to feel that the nascent city of Las Vegas was threatening to become a ghost town.

But nowadays Helldorado is the rare Vegas event definitely geared to locals. Fans given out on wooden sticks urged support for local judicial candidates. "I like to see the politicians," Monica Patalong told me as she monitored a group of four children watching the parade. She added: "I like that they moved it to the evening instead of during the day. The history is important, and in Las Vegas it is always good to have something you can bring kids to."

In fact, families and seniors lined much of the parade route, making up the majority of spectators. Carol Layland, 70, told me she has come to more Helldorado Days Parades than she can recall. "This brings back many memories," Layland said while awaiting the start of the parade. "It used to have a much longer parade route. But I still enjoy it every time."

Perhaps the most recognizable presence in the parade this year was Las Vegas Mayor Oscar Goodman, bearing a supersized version of his trademark martini. After waving to every person he could find, Goodman explained his take on the Helldorado Days Parade to me:  "This is what Las Vegas is all about, a sense of community. It is absolutely a locals' thing."

(Photo by Sarah Gerke)



Advertisement

About the Bloggers

Recent Comments


Categories


Recent Posts
Movable Buffet: Final entry |  November 4, 2009, 1:05 pm »
Photos from Fangoria: Trinity of Terrors |  November 1, 2009, 8:45 am »
Oops, I am a tourist (and it's expensive) |  October 31, 2009, 10:00 am »
Fright Dome: Huge haunted houses at Circus Circus |  October 30, 2009, 11:47 am »

Archives