The Movable Buffet: Dispatches from Las Vegas by Richard Abowitz

« Spitzer: no crime, no story? | Main | Tanning at Palms Place: George Maloof a little pale »

Pure investigation unnerves Vegas from celebs to Fire Department

12:04 PM PT, Mar 17 2008
Barber It is fascinating to see the Las Vegas media come at the story of the IRS investigation into Pure Management Group from so many perspectives that it could seem like piling on. It is not.

What is at stake is the image of Las Vegas in a perfect storm of issues that the Strip has tried hard to put in the past: money shenanigans, customers feeling bullied at resorts and, most important, making customers feel like they are being treated like marks while being financially strip-mined for cash.

Oh, and the overriding operating principal that the safety of tourists and employees is the first concern of every resort in Las Vegas. Then there is the belief that local officials charged with the crucial job of guaranteeing that remains true are always ready to stand-up to the mighty resorts of the Vegas Strip in the interest of public safety.

The key to Las Vegas has always been a certain straightforward greed. For example, the casinos set their slot machines in Vegas to hold roughly 2%-4% based on the machine. That means that for every $1 you stick into a slot, the machine is set up over time to return to you a few pennies less than you inserted. It adds up for the resort. But in the short term the customer can win money, a lot of money.
The problem is that if you keep playing long enough the resort will receive the hold. Therefore, the customers know they don't have an even chance.

Customers also know that winning requires that old abstraction -- luck -- to intervene against odds. But the casinos are bigger believers in odds than in luck. Yet for everyone involved to be comfortable with these numbers, the payout has to be straightforward and meticulous. And Nevada gaming regulators make sure that everything is transparent. Even the backgrounds of all those who work in a casino are supposed to be heavily vetted. This explains much of the coverage of the PMG-IRS issue over the last two days.

Review-Journal gossip columnist Norm Clarke tried to find out information on "growing tension" between PMG and celebrity investors like Celine Dion, Andre Agassi and Shaquille O'Neal.

On Sunday the Sun ran a detailed story on PMG managing parter Steve Davidovici that touched on his mysterious background. The Sun traced the history of protective orders issued and allegations made by  ex-wives and associates, as well as covering his civil case history. (...continued...)

Here is one example from the Sun story that ought to have Harrah's (Caesars parent company) concerned: "The degree of power and influence Davidovici exercised was surprising, especially given that he was operating these cash-happy clubs just steps away from the highly regulated casino floors. Take, for instance, the case of Ira Kiener, a club patron who filed a civil suit against Pure, Caesars Palace and Davidovici after an altercation in 2005.

"According to the suit, Kiener negotiated an 'entry fee' with Davidovici at the door to cover himself and his party. But when they entered, Kiener said Davidovici excluded two people. When Kiener complained, he alleged that Davidovici 'verbally and forcibly ejected' him from the premises. Kiener complained to Caesars management but was told the casino 'could do nothing — because they did not own, manage or control' the nightclub.

"While on his way back to his car, Kiener said, he had another encounter with Davidovici, who, accompanied by four bouncers, rushed him on the casino floor. They attempted to drag Kiener into the nightclub, he said. Security officers soon came, handcuffed him and handed Davidovici Kiener’s driver’s license. Davidovici disappeared into the nightclub and returned to hand back the license, the suit says.

" 'Now, I know where you live,' Davidovici told Kiener, the suit says.

"Davidovici denies the allegations."

Could any prospective employee with as sketchy a background as outlined in the Sun story get a job that allows him to work handling cash inside the casino in a resort? Probably not.  

And this was in 2005. How many other complaints over the years did Harrah's and/or Caesars get about Pure, and what, if anything, did they do about it?

For now, Harrah's is refusing to discuss the issue with me beyond noting that an investigation is underway and referring me to the public relations team for Pure Management Group. That attitude (to paraphrase: "This situation is not Harrah's problem but PMG's issue") has infuriated Sun gaming columnist Jeff Simpson, who writes this morning: "Las Vegas resort operators need to take immediate steps to eliminate tipping shakedowns in nightclubs in their properties." Simpson then concludes his column with the same point: "It's time for our resorts to stamp out tipping shakedowns in nightclubs." Simpson does not doubt that resorts have the power to accomplish this act. Leases are notoriously tilted in favor of casino landlords.

But the most shocking allegation to emerge this weekend was written by Review-Journal columnist John L. Smith on Sunday. Smith reports on a fire inspector visit to Pure in 2006. The inspectors asked Pure to hold the door (not let anyone else inside) because of the size of the crowd. This is routine, and I have seen it happen at concerts in Vegas at independent venues. The door is held, some people inside leave, and then the hold is lifted and the line moves inside.

But that did not happen this time, according to Smith: "Instead of following the decision, two members of Pure management asked to speak with the inspector's supervisor. The discussion ended with the inspector leaving the club, one informed source said."


And that is not where it ended either. Here is the true horror. Back to Smith:

"But, according to one source, something very important did come at least in part from that disagreement at the door of the nightclub.

"In January 2007, the Fire Department discontinued its practice of placing a fire inspector on the night shift.

"That's right.

"In Las Vegas, with arguably the hottest nightclub and topless cabaret culture in the world, the fire department charged with keeping the Strip from burning down gave its inspector the night off. Every night, in fact."

If true, this shocking behavior would have to be seen as part of a pattern of Harrah's properties like Rio getting special consideration from local fire inspectors and also in light of the recent fire at the Monte Carlo.

And so, from celebrity, to the smell of small-town back-scratching, to the shaking down of tourists, to fundamental fire safety issues, the PMG-IRS story has it all being alleged in the worst way possible.

And as a result, the media are finally putting the puzzle together from all directions.

How much longer will the resorts be able to do nothing but say that this nightclub issue involves only their tenants? 

Courtesy photo: Tampa Bay Buccaneers star Ronde Barber at Pure this weekend
 
Bookmark it:  Digg It!    Del.icio.us!

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83452364969e200e5512dbde08833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Pure investigation unnerves Vegas from celebs to Fire Department :


Grasping at straws! I understand why everyone wants to vilify the Vegas club owners. However, the TRUTH is that no one puts a gun to anyone's head or signs contracts with those "gullible" enough to hand over the cash. You hand over cash, consider it a gratuity. If you don't like the game, then do NOT go to the clubs!

I am tired of hearing people complain about things they CHOOSE to do, and I really have a hard time sympathizing with those who fork over hundreds of dollars to clubs so they can feel more important than everyone else.

Yes, if the clubs are hiding revenues from the IRS, that is an important issue. However, you will then have to also condemn all the valet attendants, baggage handlers, cocktail waitresses, and just about everyone else that receives tips (i.e. thousands of workers) in Las Vegas.

Actually Donv all of the valet attendants, baggage handlers, cocktail waitresses have tip agreements with the IRS in Vegas. The allegations appear to be that the club ppl were not accounting for all of the off the book money

The solution is for people to go to other cities to party if Vegas can't get their act together. New Orleans, Toronto, Miami, & Cabo, are just a few places that has a comparable Vegas night life. Vegas lures you with the cheap rooms, but you'll spend about the same or less elsewhere once you include all the "gratuties" you have to pony up there. Give Vegas a rest and let them straighten out the mess.

to comment posted by spencer:

"The solution is for people to go to other cities to party if Vegas can't get their act together. New Orleans, Toronto, Miami, & Cabo, are just a few places that has a comparable Vegas night life. Vegas lures you with the cheap rooms, but you'll spend about the same or less elsewhere once you include all the "gratuties" you have to pony up there. Give Vegas a rest and let them straighten out the mess."

To clear up a thing or 3......

1) Those are hardly comparable comparisons. New Orleans and Cabo have horrible nightlife, Toronto is cool but far from the same due to Canadian regulations, and tip shakedown's in Miami are far worse than anything you'd find in Las Vegas. If you stand in line long enough in Las Vegas, you'll get in. Half the people in Miami's club lines simply won't ever pass through the ropes.

2) Las Vegas hotel rooms are far from "cheap." Check any online outlet, and find them to be often more expensive than the other cities you've mentioned (with the obvious seasonal exceptions).

3) The situation with the IRS in Las Vegas is only involving one of many nightlife management groups. The vast majority of them are IRS compliant.

Don V, you'll probably discount what follows, but so be it. I'm an affluent guy who's been urged several times in the past year to go the Vegas for the restaurants and clubs. I have beeb skeptical, but my resistance had been crumbling until I happened upon the stories about Pure.

It's not really the cost, because quite frankly I can afford it. The issue is the unpredictability, crassness and even the lack of basic safety. If I know what I'll be paying, to whom, and when, fine. But if I can be shaken down at any moment by some goombah, it's a different matter. And what's this about the local fire department being paid off not to inspect?

I'm afraid Vegas will have to survive without me. Boo-hoo!

to comment posted by Scott C:

I only have one question so we can clear up 1 thing. Which club management group do you work for in Las Vegas?

I could not agree more vegas has become way to expensive. When in fact you come to gamble and in turn receive the best of everything. now your raked with less chance to win then ever an made to pay top dollar for only a small part of everything. I know that vegas figures that the masses will never figure this out ;but your proof that the old attage you can fool all of the people some of the time but never all of the people all of the time may just bite some of these hugh corperations where it will hurt for a long long time.

Add a comment
If you are under 13 years of age you may read this message board, but you may not participate.
Here are the full legal terms you agree to by using this comment form.

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until they've been approved.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In






ADVERTISEMENT


Subscribe
to Blog:
MyLATimes
More RSS Readers
Categories