The Movable Buffet: Dispatches from Las Vegas by Richard Abowitz

« Heidi Fleiss back in trouble | Main | Katie Rees: woman of the night »

Vegas headliners vs. Vegas press

09:00 AM PT, Feb 11 2008
Rich Little gave my colleague Mike Weatherford from Review-Journal a spanking in an interview with KNPR for a review of the impressionist's new show at the Golden Nugget. Referring to Weatherford first writing a flattering profile of Little before giving a lackluster review to the Golden Nugget show, Little told radio host Dave Berns, "He makes friends with you and then he stabs you in the back." Weatherford responded with a column explaining that his job in writing a profile is entirely different from his job as reviewer.

A profile writer tries to shed light on a performer's life and career and describe to the curious what a new show or artist is bringing to Vegas. Obviously, as a reviewer, Weatherford's concern is in evaluating the quality of entertainment offered to the audience. In short, listening to Rich Little tell anecdotes backstage was fascinating and fun for Weatherford, but watching Little's show, well, not so much. Of course, this distinction can be confusing. But I think most readers are sophisticated enough to know the difference. The problem on Little's end seems to have more to do with a touchy headliner not liking a review than a strong sense that the reviewer was Judas.
 
Of course, Little is not alone; many performer egos are touchy. And Las Vegas is a very tiny town for residents involved in covering and performing Strip entertainment. We go to the same receptions, we see the same shows and work (or walk) the same red carpets. I've certainly been in Weatherford's shoes, lots.
 
You never know what will set a headliner off or even a lounge act. Two weeks ago I wrote a flattering column about Richard Cheese and Lounge Against the Machine. I love Cheese's show and have seen him perform about a dozen times. But in the article I described Cheese as "pear shaped."  The morning the story appeared, an irritated text message, sent just after 2 a.m., arrived from Cheese: "Richard -- I need you to have the phrase 'pear shaped' removed from that article without delay. Seriously, man, that's not cool." Not thinking he was actually "serious," I wrote back but never heard from him again.
 
A few times over the years, former Hard Rock headliner Jeff Beacher has been angry with items I've written on the Buffet for a variety of reasons. But his greatest fury was reserved for the time when I described in detail the maneuvering involved in Beacher's arranging a Paris Hilton interview for me. The point of the interview was to get Hilton's thoughts on Beacher, which were totally flattering. But Beacher was outraged that I had, in quoting Hilton, laid out the process designed by him for me to reach her: calling her bodyguard's cellphone to circumvent her publicist. He ordered me to take the item down or else. The item stayed up, as it was accurate. A short time later, Beacher had another story to pitch and the Paris Hilton interview imbroglio was never mentioned again.
 
Other people hold grudges longer.

The strangest conflict I have is with Harrah's headliner Rita Rudner. The reason it is strange is that I am clueless why I wound up on her bad side. I think her show is funny. But over the last few years Rudner has turned down a few requests to interview with me. At first I was told she was busy or that she had nothing to say on the topic I wanted to talk to her about. But after a few contradictions emerged, I was eventually told by her people that the problem was me. Why I was a problem was more ambiguous. Rudner and I had a nice meal once when I profiled her for a tourist magazine. And I don't think I have ever reviewed her show. But regardless, one thing was clear: Rita Rudner wanted nothing to do with me.
 
So, imagine my surprise last week when I got a pitch from Rudner's publicist, asking if I wanted to work with her to do a story on a PBS special airing Rudner's 2,000th show. One problem: I noticed that the note came from a newer member of the public relations firm that handles Rudner. So, as soon as I received the pitch last Wednesday from the publicist, I wrote back:
 
"I would be happy to interview Rita Rudner. In the past she has declined to be interviewed by me because I was told I have not been supportive enough. If her view has changed, I would welcome an interview."
 
So far no reply.

UPDATE: A few hours after this went up, I heard back from Rita Rudner's publicist. So, will Rudner finally let me interview her? Here is the note: "I apologize for my delayed response. I have requested an interview with Rita and will get back to you shortly." So, the mystery of Rita Rudner vs. the Buffet continues.
 
Bookmark it:  Digg It!    Del.icio.us!

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83452364969e200e5502d181e8833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Vegas headliners vs. Vegas press:


You don't consider "pear-shaped" to be something of an ad hominem attack, Richard? That's interesting.

Thanks for reading. Actually, I did not consider "pear shaped" an attack at all, only a description. In context I think part of Cheese's humor derives form the contrast between the way he behaves on stage and his look. Then sigh, maybe the description seems fine to me, because, well, I am sort of pear shaped myself. Yrs., Richard

Mike Weatherford is a well-regarded journalist in L.V. He's been with the R-J for a long time, and is a damn good writer. So, lighten up, Rich Little!

Add a comment
If you are under 13 years of age you may read this message board, but you may not participate.
Here are the full legal terms you agree to by using this comment form.

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until they've been approved.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In






ADVERTISEMENT


Subscribe
to Blog:
MyLATimes
More RSS Readers
Categories