The Movable Buffet

Dispatches from Las Vegas
by Richard Abowitz

Category: April 2007

| The Movable Buffet Home |

Which Cirque show to see?

April 23, 2007 | 11:17 am
Darrendossantosfromka More often than I am asked what show to see in Vegas, I am asked what Cirque show to see. People who want to see Phantom or Penn & Teller don't need me to tell them. Those shows are known quantities. People just need to read the show names from time-to-time in Vegas to be reminded they are here. Same with Celine and Elton. But while Cirque has gone to great lengths to market all of their shows as different, the truth remains Cirque has certain qualities that assert themselves in all of their productions. Surrealism, acrobats, and an unmistakable overall sensibility. People ask, if they can only see one Cirque show which one should it be? So, here are my choices and reasons for which Cirque show to see.
 
1. Mystere. This was the first Cirque show to open in Vegas. But age has not changed the fact that this 1993 work presents much of the experience of touring Ciruqe shows expanded into what at the time was a colossal new freestanding endeavor. A lot of Cirque's best ideas found a home here. Mystere retains, more than a decade later, the thematic coherence and wonderful surprising quirkiness that makes it not just the classic Cirque show but still at least the equal to its newer brethren. The coolest thing about Mystere is that tickets are easier to get your hands on than for many of the newer Cirque shows.
 
2. O. It isn't entirely fair to call O: Mystere on water. But it isn't exactly wrong either. The water tanks of O don't necessarily improve on the stage of Mystere; they hold a different set of challenges and opportunities for the skilled performers. In fact, the show shares many of the merits of Mystere and, if you like diving, attempts to be more impressive by adding many aquatic tricks. O is a fabulous show that remains as wonderful as its predecessor, Mystere.  Many think it better and I won't argue. In fact, the only reason that Mystere gets the nod on this list is that first loves are always special.
 
3. Love. If you are a Beatles fan jump this up to number 1. If you are not, Love is the hottest in ticket in town for good reason: it is a fantastic show with some of the best music ever made playing out of speakers placed in each seat for a sonic experience like no other. In short, you could do worse than to see Love. But you can also do better. This is a collaboration. You really are giving up a lot of what makes Cirque special in order to tell the story of the four lads from Liverpool in their own sounds and based on much of their song's imagery and Beatles myth. All of this is what makes Love such a joy to fans of both Cirque and the Beatles. But, if you have never seen a Cirque show and/or merely like the Beatles, you might want to think twice before expending the energy it takes to get good seats.
 
 
4. KA. Bargain seats seem easier to find for KA than any of the other Cirque shows. If you find a two-for-one deal or a good discount, you will have a bargain Cirque experience that won't disappoint. In fact, this may be the most expensive and extravagant show Cirque mounts in Vegas. I can only imagine how awed by Ka I would have been if I had not seen so many other Cirque shows first. In some ways the stage(s) overshadows the performers at KA. But that isn't the performers fault. The moving plates that make up KA's stage must be among the most extraordinary stages in the world. And, while this was billed as the first Cirque show to tell a story the truth is that the narrative only underscores that Ka lacks that sense of united thematic purpose that Mystere and O achieve seemingly organically and effortlessly.
 
 
5. It isn't really fair to put Zumanity at the bottom of this list. After all, it is an extremely good show by any measure. It wasn't so when it opened. But Cirque took the time and energy to work out the kinks in its kinky show, and over the years Zumanity has evolved into the second best erotic show in Vegas. What makes Zumanity different from every other Cirque show is it has intentionally limited appeal. Zumanity is for a broad minded adult audience. As one expects from Cirqiue, Zumanity is much more creative than any of the chorus line topless shows at other resorts. It isn't even a fair comparison. But, on a certain level, Cirque's all embracing message gets garbled in this erotic frame. Zumanity always feels like the Cirque show that seems more customized to fill a niche than a true expression of Cirque's broadening aesthetic.
 
Maybe that is why I feel the need for one footnote on Zumanity: I have to give a shout-out to Fashionistas (Empire Ballroom), because that show adds narrative flair and goes even further than Zumanity in bringing to stage a sophisticated and envelope pushing sensuality. Also, the dancers of Fashionistas prove better at erotic expression than the athletes of Cirque. You would never say that even the weakest regular Cirque show, Ka, was equaled by any imitator like Le Reve. Yet, for erotic shows, Zumanity is definitely bettered in Fashionistas.

(Photos by Sarah Gerke)

Red carpet, lucky Star, Real World

April 22, 2007 | 10:32 am
Img_2037stevenhill Last night I went to the red carpet opening of the Pearl concert hall at the Palms. The actual event was a Gwen Stefani concert, but the red carpet led to a reception not the show. The publicist told me that I was not allowed in the reception. I am always curious how access is granted to press at events like this at resorts. And, when I don't get into an event, I turn touchy and pushy. For example, recently, also, at the Palms, I walked out of the Playboy Club red carpet opening when I noticed (in addition, to problems on the red carpet) other press being allowed up to the opening party and not Movable Buffet.
 
You will have to take my word for this: I am not being a diva or prima donna. I don't even  want to be inside at these parties: honest! While covering Vegas, I've seen enough free sushi and minor celebrities packed into smoke filled rooms. My need to get as much access as possible is all about my respect and duty to you, the readers. I feel honored, empowered and challenged by all of you who read Movable Buffet to bring you the most exclusive and complete coverage available. My readers deserve the best possible access from an LA Times blog, and I take it as an insult when other audiences are treated better than you, the one I serve. In this case, last night at the Palms, I was even more amazed, because while the person who covers events for the ABC radio network and I remained on the red carpet, the stringer working for the tabloid Star was allowed into the reception to get exclusive coverage.
 
One moment from the red carpet I want to share involves the Real World reunion currently going on at the casino. I asked Palms owner George Maloof as he passed by if there had been any surprises: "You never know what is going to happen," Maloof said. "There have been a few little things. We will have to see what they put together." Asked to be more specific, Maloof offered, "There was an incident at the pool." I followed up, still, Maloof wouldn't give up the details.

But fortunately, not too long after Maloof entered the party, the Real World cast took to the red carpet and I managed to get the details of the pool incident from the guilty party: Steven Hill. According to Hill:
 
"I got a little intoxicated and things happened. I got drunk and a girl was chasing after me. She threw a drink on me; I threw a drink on her; I jumped in the water to get away from her like a little child. That's it. It was stupid. I was banned from the pool for 12 hours. It was a long 12 hours."

(Photo by Sarah Gerke)

Issues between beauty and magic?

April 20, 2007 |  9:19 am
Hansklok I admit I don't know much about Hans Klok who is preparing to launch a show at Planet Hollywood: "The Beauty of Magic." As much as I've thought about it, the show has stuck in my mind because the German magician has hired beauty Carmen Electra to be his assistant. Apparently, I am not the only one to think of "The Beauty of Magic" as the Carmen Electra show. Carmen Electra does, too. Or, at least, Norm reports in his column today, that Carmen Electra has been a diva in rehearsals; this could be behind the opening of the show being postponed until May 19. I am not sure I believe it. I've interviewed Electra a few times and seen her at many events in Vegas and her behavior has always been professional, indeed, very reserved. But Norm quotes a source on Electra at the rehearsals: "She's throwing fits, crying; there's all kinds of turmoil."

(Photo by Sarah Gerke)
 


Where do bunnies come from?

April 20, 2007 |  7:49 am
The word "Bunny" appears in the advertisement for a party tonight at Body English at the Hard Rock for a model who turns 21. An actual little white bunny is shown coming out of a hat in the advertisement. Also, four "playmates" are listed as attending the birthday party along with the guest of honor, Athena Lundberg, who the advertisement lists as Miss January 2006. The one word missing from the advertisement is the name of the magazine that these words and images all seem meant to conjure: Playboy. The Playboy Club, of course, is located at Hard Rock rival the Palms.
 
By the way, if you are heading down to the Hard Rock tonight for Athena Lundberg's party, according to Playboy's site, the birthday bunny is looking for: "A guy with a great smile, someone who likes to cook for me and has a sense of humor."

Dita bathes at Crazy Horse

April 19, 2007 |  2:41 pm
Ditaseanmccallbath_3 Coincidently, I was at the other Crazy Horse at the MGM last night checking out Dita Von Teese's guest stint. It was the first time I've seen Crazy Horse since it changed its name from La Femme as well as its ownership. The revamped Crazy Horse in Vegas has changed in the sense that there is a lot less striptease leading up to an unveiling: things are mostly topless now. Still, the basic show is the same and Crazy Horse still offers the most arty of the chorus line and spotlight topless shows in Vegas. And, the showgirls are always among the most beautiful in Vegas. Still, classy isn't necessarily exciting. The obsession with polka dot lighting gives the show a very 70s look to me. Crazy Horse remains an archetype that exposes imitators like Crazy Girls at Riviera as derivative. But both Cirque's Zumanity and John Stagliano's Fashionistas have taken the erotic show to another level in Vegas providing a more sophisticated and theatrically rewarding experiences than any chorus line doing chair dances.
 
The highlight of the show was Dita Von Teese. Her bubble bath was as much in the spirit of fun as sensuality. Good to have pasties back in Vegas. The audience came alive for her guest spot and gave standing ovations when she returned to the stage. My guess is that Von Teese could create an interesting and successful Vegas show given the connection she instantly established with this Wednesday night audience at MGM. She certainly seems to be holding Vegas in the palm of her gloved hand. This morning I even heard her on KNPR's State of Nevada discoursing on the history of burlesque to help bring in the calls for pledge week.

Crazy Horse Too keeps license

April 19, 2007 |  9:28 am
You would think, with all of the effort elected city officials have put into keeping topless bar Crazy Horse Too open, the place must offer some essential and irreplaceable service to the city. Well, it is the room where Dita and Jenna Jameson both got their start. But mostly, these days, the club is known for scandal and the occasional customer allegedly  beaten by the bouncers in bar tab disputes.

To work this all out, Rick Rizzolo, the old owner of Crazy Horse Too, was required to sell the club as part of a plea deal that included guilty pleas from 14 of his employees and associates. But the problem from the first has been hints that the new owner, Mike Signorelli, has allowed old owner, Rizzolo and company to stick around and influence the running of the club. Originally, the sale agreement was so brazen that Rizzolo would even have been allowed to have an office at the club. Why would Rizollo want an office there when he no longer owned Crazy Horse Too? (And, when he was not allowed to have any involvement with the club at all?) The office idea got tossed from the agreement.
Continue reading »

Is it live or Robert Goulet?

April 18, 2007 | 10:02 am
Img_1543 I don't actually know Robert Goulet, but I get a Christmas card from him and his wife Vera every year. This started after I had dinner with him in 2001 while writing a story on a show he opened at the Venetian. Goulet had rented the theatre in the Venetian for a planned summer run. Sadly, the show closed quickly, and Goulet complained about how much money he lost staging it. I think that moment was a watershed in the transformation between old Vegas and new. Back in the day, a headliner like Robert Goulet was just the sort of entertainer who could always draw a break even audience in Vegas. But by 2001 (the year the Palms opened) entertainment had really changed models for Vegas. For one thing, the days of entertainment being a loss leader were over. Also, the Venetian was not a partner in the show at all. I don't even recall if Goulet got his name on the marquee in front of the resort. That means expensive marketing bills and back then Goulet was renting the room with his own cash and essentially promoting his own show. He closed quickly.
 
Anyway, the one positive thing I remember from 2001 was that Robert Goulet has an amazing voice. It was an extraordinary thing to hear him sing live. I will never forget it. So, I am not surprised that upon hearing him recently sing at Fenway Park a reporter from Lowell Sun mistakenly claimed Goulet was mouthing to a taped performance. He was not. The correction in the Lowell Sun contains a statement from Vera Goulet: "Lip-synching seems to be the norm with singers in today's world, but Mr. Goulet never has, nor will he ever lip-sync when performing. Mr. Goulet's voice is as powerful as it was 50 years ago."

(Photo by Sarah Gerke)
 

 


Airport to Strip: avoid tunnel

April 16, 2007 | 10:30 am
Taxi On Saturday night I rode along with a taxi driver to report a column that I am writing  for the Sunday Calendar print version of Movable Buffet. Driving a taxi in Las Vegas is different than any other city, because of the monotony of the trips. Almost everything involves driving around the Strip. And, on Saturday night, the Strip is a perpetual bumper-to-bumper rush hour, added to an obstacle course's worth of accidents, construction and closures to drive around. 
 
Anyway, the most useful tip I picked up for you in California who fly into Vegas involves getting from the airport to the Strip via taxi. Do NOT let the taxi driver take the tunnel: insist on the surface streets. This is actually advice given to me by Ernest Ganem who has 17 years experience driving a cab in Vegas. We made three trips to the airport and as we left each time we were the only taxi who took the surface street with our passengers. On the way, Ganem pointed out to me the stream of taxis entering the tunnel. Most probably with passengers (like all of our passengers) who wanted to go to the Strip. "No matter what," Ganem says, "going to the Strip through the tunnel adds about $6 to your fare. It costs at least $20 through the tunnel. From the airport to the center of the Strip like Mirage and Caesars should be about $14-15, south end of the Strip like Mandalay Bay, Excalibur and Luxor about $12, and north Strip like Riviera and Circus Circus can run you $15-16. Traffic in rush hour, especially on Friday, can put it up a $1-2.  But if they (taxis) go through the tunnel no matter what they (the customers) are ripped off."
(photo by Sarah Gerke)

This Nevadan explains not volunteering

April 16, 2007 |  9:23 am
In another dubious achievement, Nevada citizens have the lowest percentage of volunteer rates in the country; we sit at the bottom of a new ranking of all the 50 States. In Utah (the highest ranked State) about 45.9% of residents do some sort of volunteer work in their communities whereas in Nevada that number rests at 17.5%.  And, unlike our booming economy in Nevada, we are joined in the bottom 5 by states like Mississippi and Louisiana where dealing with natural disaster has probably impacted the ability of people there to volunteer. We are also the worst state, by far, even among the bottom 5; every single one of the other states, at least, broke 20% meaning 1 in 5 people doing some sort of volunteer work.
 
So, what is wrong with the people in Nevada?  In part, I think the problem is in the infrastructure. I am among the massive majority of people in Nevada who do no volunteer work at all. Here is my story and excuse; take what follows for the personal anecdote that it is. When I lived in Minnesota (number 3 on the new list of states with 40.4% of residents volunteering) in the 90's, there were organizations all over the state that were reaching out looking for volunteers in every imaginable area.  I was spoiled on that Minnesota model. In Minnesota I could have called a toll free number, listed my interests and received in exchange a list of organizations that I could volunteer at. So, I expected volunteering would be an easy thing to arrange whenever I was ready to do it.
 
Continue reading »

TripAdvisor reviewed

April 12, 2007 |  8:40 am
If you are planning a vacation to Las Vegas I would recommend a visit to TripAdvisor.com as a repository of valuable information, opinion and tips. I spent hours this morning going over their Las Vegas section and I learned a couple things to add to my trivia arsenal: for one, apparently, there are very few pet friendly hotel options in Vegas and, two, there appears not to be a single bed and breakfast inn here.
 
From the safety tips to the information on getting a good room rate, most of the basics are covered. A lot of the advice is accurate, if a bit general. Not the last word, by a stretch. But the steps they urge visitors to take and the links to more detailed information provided will both get you to everything you could want to know.
 
I was a little surprised by the list of best hotels in Las Vegas that TripAdvisor offers as ranked by their travelers. The Signature MGM Grand was the top choice. A nice place, though not on the Strip. In fact, the Four Seasons at #4 is the first Las Vegas Boulevard address on the best hotel list beating out The Holiday Inn Express on Polaris. And this has to be the only list of the best hotels in Vegas to include Bill's Gamblin' Hall & Saloon in the top ten? That hotel, by the way, is the recently renamed Barbary Coast.  I think that is a pretty good choice, though; Barbary Coast was always a cool overlooked hotel.
 
The member reviews are definitely the highlight. These are frequent travelers who clearly know how to pick over a hotel's service, amenities and condition. A recent article in the New York Times interviewed a number of hotel operators (none from Vegas) about how closely they monitor and respond to their reviews on TripAdvisor. And, while I can't vouch for any specific review, based on what I know about the hotels on the Strip, these customer reviews are, generally speaking, on-target. I am curious how much attention reviews from web sites like TripAdvisor get from Vegas resorts. My guess is more than they are going to want to tell me when I start making calls to ask. I may be wrong.  We will see.
 



Advertisement

About the Bloggers

Recent Comments


Categories


Recent Posts
Movable Buffet: Final entry |  November 4, 2009, 1:05 pm »
Photos from Fangoria: Trinity of Terrors |  November 1, 2009, 8:45 am »
Oops, I am a tourist (and it's expensive) |  October 31, 2009, 10:00 am »
Fright Dome: Huge haunted houses at Circus Circus |  October 30, 2009, 11:47 am »

Archives